Digital marking versus manual marking technique for toric intraocular lens alignment: a meta-analysis.

BMC Ophthalmol

Department of Ophthalmology, Tongji Medical College, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No 26 Shengli Street, Wuhan, 430014, China.

Published: September 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Manual and digital-assisted marking are the two main marking methods used for toric intraocular lens (IOL) in cataract surgery. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding the consistency in accuracy for these two methods. This meta-analysis aimed to compare and evaluate the accuracy of digital and manual marking techniques for toric IOL alignment during cataract surgery.

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to identify studies that compared the effectiveness of these two techniques in positioning toric IOLs. The primary outcome measures included postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), mean deviation from target-induced astigmatism, and postoperative IOL misalignment. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3 software.

Results: This meta-analysis included four randomized controlled trials and three retrospective studies comprising 197 eyes in the digital marking group and 206 eyes in the manual marking group for comparative analyses. The statistical meta-analysis indicated no significant differences in postoperative UDVA (logMAR) between the two groups (P = 0.69). Additionally, the meta-analysis showed no significant differences in postoperative CDVA (logMAR) between the two groups (P = 0.29). However, the meta-analysis findings highlighted a significant reduction in the degree of postoperative IOL misalignment in the digital marking group compared to the manual marking group (P = 0.0001).

Conclusions: The results of this meta-analysis offer compelling evidence that the digital marking technique resulted in a lower postoperative IOL misalignment rate than that for the traditional manual marking technique. Both marking methodologies were encouraged in clinical practice because of their effectiveness and accuracy; although, the digital marking technique was generally preferred and highly recommended.

Trial Registration: The protocol of this study was registered in PROSPERO (registration ID: CRD420251045237).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12403446PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-04329-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

digital marking
20
manual marking
20
marking technique
16
marking group
16
marking
12
postoperative iol
12
iol misalignment
12
toric intraocular
8
intraocular lens
8
accuracy digital
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: Prolonged Emergency Department (ED) stays, a global issue driving overcrowding, were exacerbated at our hospital by lab delays and extended waits, increasing patient stress. This study aimed to reduce hematology patients' length of stay (LOS). Using the fishbone method to identify care barriers, three interventions were implemented: redesigned lab referral systems, an online specialist communication platform, and patient navigation floor maps.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) promises to open a new range of personalized treatments due to breaking the limits of former panel-based methods of molecular analysis. While the methodology is well established and already included in clinical practice, data standardization is still lacking and potentially limiting implementation of machine-based data processing due to a lack of syntactic and semantic interoperability. The HL7 FHIR standard provides the mechanisms to retain interoperability while being sufficiently flexible to accommodate semantic concepts.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Digital marking versus manual marking technique for toric intraocular lens alignment: a meta-analysis.

BMC Ophthalmol

September 2025

Department of Ophthalmology, Tongji Medical College, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No 26 Shengli Street, Wuhan, 430014, China.

Background: Manual and digital-assisted marking are the two main marking methods used for toric intraocular lens (IOL) in cataract surgery. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding the consistency in accuracy for these two methods. This meta-analysis aimed to compare and evaluate the accuracy of digital and manual marking techniques for toric IOL alignment during cataract surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Health disparities in pediatric, adolescent, and young adult (AYA) oncology remain a significant challenge, with socioeconomic status, geographic location, race, and ethnicity contributing to unequal access to care and poorer outcomes. Emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence (AI) and immersive tools such as virtual and augmented reality (VR/AR), offer transformative solutions to address these inequities. AI has demonstrated potential in enhancing diagnostic accuracy, tailoring treatment plans, and providing personalized patient navigation to guide families through complex care pathways.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Launched in January 2022, the SingHealth Patient Advocacy Network at the Department of Emergency Medicine (SPAN@DEM) represents the first emergency department-specific advocacy group in Singapore. This initiative marks a significant advancement in local patient advocacy efforts because it employs a shared collaborative model to address the needs and concerns of patients within the unique context of the emergency department environment. SPAN@DEM emerged in recognition of the limitations of existing cluster-level advocacy groups, which are inadequate to address specific challenges inherent to the fast-paced, high-pressure nature of the emergency department.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF