98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: The implementation of eHealth technologies can improve healthcare efficiency, accessibility, and affordability. However, it involves complex legal, ethical, financial, and technological (LEFT) challenges that can impede success. While our previous scoping review identified barriers such as balancing compliance with innovation, funding gaps, and unclear business models, there remains a significant gap in understanding how these challenges manifest in real-world settings. This study uses grey literature to explore practical experiences and strategies in addressing LEFT challenges during eHealth implementation.
Objective: This study aims to explore real-world experiences and perspectives on the legal, ethical, financial, and technological (LEFT) challenges encountered during eHealth implementation.
Methods: A grey literature review was conducted by querying databases BASE and Policy Commons, consulting expert references for relevant reports, and using snowball sampling to identify additional relevant grey literature.
Results: While the aim of this study was to explore practical experiences, the grey literature mainly reflects policy-level concerns, including strategic and regulatory challenges, with limited insight into how organizations navigate eHealth implementation in practice. Legal barriers include navigating complex regulatory frameworks, interpreting regulations, and concerns about data privacy. Facilitators focus on centralized governance and Europe's role in the global data market. Ethical barriers address inequalities in access, while facilitators emphasize patient autonomy, clear consent processes, and digital literacy. Financial barriers stem from inadequate funding structures and unclear financial requirements, with public-private partnerships as facilitators. Technological barriers revolve around interoperability issues due to national IT infrastructure limitations, with facilitators working to improve data exchange.
Conclusions: This study highlights a disconnect between the strategic focus of available grey literature and the need for actionable, practice-based insights. The limited presence of real-world implementation experiences underscores the necessity for more operational documentation to support stakeholders facing interrelated LEFT barriers. Key challenges include the need for actionable legal and ethical frameworks, clearer ethical discussions aligned with legal requirements, sustainable financial infrastructures, and enhanced stakeholder involvement to address interoperability challenges. These challenges require cross-sector investment in IT infrastructures, harmonized data standards, and stronger collaboration among stakeholders. Coordinated efforts across all LEFT domains are crucial for effective eHealth implementation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12390996 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1575620 | DOI Listing |
J Nephrol
September 2025
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, John Walls' Renal Unit, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
Background: Individuals with kidney failure experience elevated cardiovascular risk, potentially worsened by the presence of sleep disordered breathing. Despite this association, prevalence of sleep apnoea, and evidence for effective treatments are poorly understood in people with kidney failure. This review examines sleep apnoea prevalence, types of sleep apnoea, and treatment interventions in people with kidney failure receiving dialysis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Clin Pharmacol
September 2025
Hospital Management Research Center, Health Management Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Introduction: Metastatic breast cancer (mBC) is a major global health challenge. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), including trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), and sacituzumab govitecan (SG), offer clinical benefits but are associated with high costs, making cost-effectiveness assessments essential for policy decisions.
Methods: This systematic review analyzed economic evaluations comparing T-DM1, T-DXd, and SG with conventional treatments in breast cancer.
Zhongguo Ying Yong Sheng Li Xue Za Zhi
September 2025
PSIT-Pranveer Singh Institute of Technology (Pharmacy), Kanpur - Agra - Delhi, NH#2, Bhauti, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Hemocyanin is dissolved freely in hemolymph, the invertebrate blood substitute, in contrast to haemoglobin, which is encased in red blood cells. When oxygenated, this pigment gives mollusc and arthropod blood its characteristic blue or purple hue. This review article delves into the fascinating biology of hemocyanin, the copper-based oxygen-carrying protein responsible for "purple blood" in many invertebrates, contrasting its characteristics with the more familiar iron-based hemoglobin.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLancet Reg Health West Pac
August 2025
Western Australian Centre for Rural Health, University of Western Australia, Geraldton, Western Australia, Australia.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (hereafter respectfully named Indigenous) Australians are diagnosed with some cancers substantially more frequently than non-Indigenous Australians implying a different risk factor landscape. Additionally, poorer outcomes for certain cancers are exacerbated by lower cancer screening rates and later diagnoses compared to non-Indigenous Australians. An improved understanding of cancer causation would allow better shaping and targeting of screening programs for those at the highest risk.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOTJR (Thorofare N J)
September 2025
Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Co-design is increasingly being adopted within mental health service design and delivery, but is less common in research. Co-design ensures that research is relevant and benefits people accessing services. This review examined frameworks, models, and/or guidelines for co-designing mental health research, asking: (a) How is co-design defined? (b) What are the elements, values, and design tools? (c) What recommendations are proposed? A scoping review of peer-reviewed and gray literature on co-design in mental health research was undertaken and narratively synthesized.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF