Unveiling practical insights of eHealth implementation in Europe: a grey literature review on legal, ethical, financial, and technological (LEFT) considerations.

Front Digit Health

Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, Section of Psychology, Health and Technology, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.

Published: August 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: The implementation of eHealth technologies can improve healthcare efficiency, accessibility, and affordability. However, it involves complex legal, ethical, financial, and technological (LEFT) challenges that can impede success. While our previous scoping review identified barriers such as balancing compliance with innovation, funding gaps, and unclear business models, there remains a significant gap in understanding how these challenges manifest in real-world settings. This study uses grey literature to explore practical experiences and strategies in addressing LEFT challenges during eHealth implementation.

Objective: This study aims to explore real-world experiences and perspectives on the legal, ethical, financial, and technological (LEFT) challenges encountered during eHealth implementation.

Methods: A grey literature review was conducted by querying databases BASE and Policy Commons, consulting expert references for relevant reports, and using snowball sampling to identify additional relevant grey literature.

Results: While the aim of this study was to explore practical experiences, the grey literature mainly reflects policy-level concerns, including strategic and regulatory challenges, with limited insight into how organizations navigate eHealth implementation in practice. Legal barriers include navigating complex regulatory frameworks, interpreting regulations, and concerns about data privacy. Facilitators focus on centralized governance and Europe's role in the global data market. Ethical barriers address inequalities in access, while facilitators emphasize patient autonomy, clear consent processes, and digital literacy. Financial barriers stem from inadequate funding structures and unclear financial requirements, with public-private partnerships as facilitators. Technological barriers revolve around interoperability issues due to national IT infrastructure limitations, with facilitators working to improve data exchange.

Conclusions: This study highlights a disconnect between the strategic focus of available grey literature and the need for actionable, practice-based insights. The limited presence of real-world implementation experiences underscores the necessity for more operational documentation to support stakeholders facing interrelated LEFT barriers. Key challenges include the need for actionable legal and ethical frameworks, clearer ethical discussions aligned with legal requirements, sustainable financial infrastructures, and enhanced stakeholder involvement to address interoperability challenges. These challenges require cross-sector investment in IT infrastructures, harmonized data standards, and stronger collaboration among stakeholders. Coordinated efforts across all LEFT domains are crucial for effective eHealth implementation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12390996PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1575620DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

grey literature
20
legal ethical
16
ehealth implementation
12
ethical financial
12
financial technological
12
technological left
12
left challenges
12
literature review
8
challenges
8
explore practical
8

Similar Publications

Background: Individuals with kidney failure experience elevated cardiovascular risk, potentially worsened by the presence of sleep disordered breathing. Despite this association, prevalence of sleep apnoea, and evidence for effective treatments are poorly understood in people with kidney failure. This review examines sleep apnoea prevalence, types of sleep apnoea, and treatment interventions in people with kidney failure receiving dialysis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Metastatic breast cancer (mBC) is a major global health challenge. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), including trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), and sacituzumab govitecan (SG), offer clinical benefits but are associated with high costs, making cost-effectiveness assessments essential for policy decisions.

Methods: This systematic review analyzed economic evaluations comparing T-DM1, T-DXd, and SG with conventional treatments in breast cancer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Beyond Hemoglobin: A Review of Hemocyanin and the Biology of Purple Blood.

Zhongguo Ying Yong Sheng Li Xue Za Zhi

September 2025

PSIT-Pranveer Singh Institute of Technology (Pharmacy), Kanpur - Agra - Delhi, NH#2, Bhauti, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Hemocyanin is dissolved freely in hemolymph, the invertebrate blood substitute, in contrast to haemoglobin, which is encased in red blood cells. When oxygenated, this pigment gives mollusc and arthropod blood its characteristic blue or purple hue. This review article delves into the fascinating biology of hemocyanin, the copper-based oxygen-carrying protein responsible for "purple blood" in many invertebrates, contrasting its characteristics with the more familiar iron-based hemoglobin.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (hereafter respectfully named Indigenous) Australians are diagnosed with some cancers substantially more frequently than non-Indigenous Australians implying a different risk factor landscape. Additionally, poorer outcomes for certain cancers are exacerbated by lower cancer screening rates and later diagnoses compared to non-Indigenous Australians. An improved understanding of cancer causation would allow better shaping and targeting of screening programs for those at the highest risk.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Co-design is increasingly being adopted within mental health service design and delivery, but is less common in research. Co-design ensures that research is relevant and benefits people accessing services. This review examined frameworks, models, and/or guidelines for co-designing mental health research, asking: (a) How is co-design defined? (b) What are the elements, values, and design tools? (c) What recommendations are proposed? A scoping review of peer-reviewed and gray literature on co-design in mental health research was undertaken and narratively synthesized.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF