98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: To compare the efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) alone versus MTX plus mifepristone for stable ectopic pregnancy, identify predictors of treatment success, and explore outcome-prediction models.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective, two‑arm observational cohort of consecutive patients with stable ectopic pregnancy treated in routine care (MTX‑only n=138; MTX+mifepristone n=132). Treatment assignment was non‑randomized, reflecting clinician judgment and patient preference. Baseline characteristics and treatment details were recorded, and the primary outcome-resolution of the EP without surgery-was assessed. Predictive factors were analyzed via logistic regression with Hosmer-Lemeshow testing for calibration. We further evaluated advanced machine learning models to classify treatment success.
Results: Overall treatment success rates were 73.91% (MTX-only) and 78.79% (MTX plus mifepristone), with no statistically significant difference between groups (p=0.38). Across the combined cohort, factors strongly predicting success included initial hCG <1500 mIU/mL (adjusted OR 2.70, p=0.01), absence of fetal cardiac activity (adjusted OR 2.10, p=0.04), lower gestational age at diagnosis (adjusted OR 0.82 per week, p=0.02), and a ≥15% hCG decline by Day 4 (adjusted OR 2.40, p=0.02). By location, success rates were similar in tubal and non‑tubal strata. The treatment × location interaction was not significant (p=0.85), and tubal‑only results were unchanged. The multivariable logistic regression predicting treatment success vs failure showed good discrimination (AUC 0.82) and adequate calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow p=0.45). In exploratory benchmarking of algorithms trained to predict success vs failure on the same predictors, gradient boosting yielded the highest apparent discrimination (accuracy 84%; AUC 0.88) in this dataset.
Conclusions: MTX plus mifepristone did not significantly outperform MTX alone in resolving stable ectopic pregnancy. Key predictors of successful medical management included lower baseline hCG levels, earlier gestational age, and substantial early hCG declines. Advanced machine learning approaches may improve predictive accuracy, supporting more individualized treatment selection for ectopic pregnancy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2025.103022 | DOI Listing |
Case Rep Womens Health
October 2025
The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China.
Progression of a caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy (CSEP) to a live birth is exceptionally rare. Whether the placenta should be removed during a caesarean section for patients with a CSEP complicated by severe placenta accreta spectrum remains unclear. This report presents the case of a 42-year-old multigravida with two prior caesarean sections who presented with CSEP at 6 weeks.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMedicine (Baltimore)
September 2025
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hebei University Affiliated Hospital, Hebei, China.
Rationale: Cesarean scar pregnancy with molar pregnancy is a rare but high-risk pregnancy complication characterized by the implantation of a fertilized egg in the uterine scar following cesarean section, accompanied by pathological manifestations of a hydatidiform mole. This paper reports a clinical case of hydatidiform mole in a cesarean scar and reviews the literature to understand its diagnosis and treatment strategies.
Patient Concerns: We reported a 33-year-old woman who presented to our hospital with intermittent vaginal bleeding for over 2 months following uterine curettage.
Ann Intern Med
September 2025
Department of Medicine, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (J.G.R.).
Background: Animal studies show ovarian follicle damage and mutagenesis after ionizing radiation exposure. Computed tomography (CT) imaging is commonly done outside pregnancy, but risks to future pregnancy are unknown.
Objective: To evaluate the risk for spontaneous pregnancy loss and congenital anomalies in offspring of women exposed to CT ionizing radiation before conception.
BJR Case Rep
September 2025
Department of Radiology, Children Hospital of Rabat, Ibn Sina University Hospital, Faculty of medicine and pharmacy of Rabat, University Mohammed V, Rabat, 10100, Morocco.
Heterotopic pregnancy refers to the concomitant presence of an intrauterine pregnancy and an ectopic pregnancy (EP). It is rare and more frequently found in women who have undergone medically assisted procreation. An abdominal location of the ectopic gestational sac is even less common, accounting for 1.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFContraception
September 2025
University of Maryland School of Medicine, 11 S Paca Street, Suite 400, Baltimore MD 21201.
We present a case of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy that was diagnosed after failed no-test medication abortion at 4 weeks gestation. The patient was treated with dilation, suction aspiration and intrauterine Foley balloon placement. No adverse outcome occurred.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF