Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
The Proposal for a new Regulation on plants produced by certain new genomic techniques (NGTs) embraces the deregulation of NGT plants but introduces a patent ban on them. This move has generated significant legal uncertainties and has become the focal point of a broader debate over the patentability of NGT plants. In reviewing the rationale and challenges underlying the patent ban, this article argues that the abandonment of patents diverges from established expectations. Introducing a new complete patent ban is likely to lead to several adverse consequences, including challenges related to justification, implementation, and innovation. Instead of radically altering the NGT plant patent framework, more practical and balanced alternatives within existing patent system - such as the establishment of a patent-clearing platform, the adoption of a compulsory licensing model and the creation of a labeling and traceability system - may offer more effective solutions.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12407908 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2025.2548638 | DOI Listing |