Early Experience with Robotic Pancreatic Resections: a Retrospective Cohort Study of 20 Consecutive Cases.

Maedica (Bucur)

Head of Department of General, Robotic and Oncologic Surgery, G. Panico Hospital, Tricase, Lecce, Italy.

Published: June 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Robotic pancreatic surgery has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to open procedures, offering potential benefits in precision and recovery. This study evaluates the feasibility, safety and learning curve of robotic duodenopancreatectomy (RDP) and robotic distal splenopancreatectomy (RDSP) during the initial phase of implementation at a single institution.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 20 consecutive patients, who underwent RDP (n=12) or RDSP (n=8) between January 2020 and December 2022, was performed. Data on operative time, intraoperative blood loss, conversion rates, postoperative complications (classified by Clavien-Dindo and ISGPS criteria) and length of hospital stay (LOS) were collected. Early (first six RDPs and four RDSPs) and late cases were compared to assess progression along the learning curve. Statistical analysis included Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests.

Results: The median operative time for RDP decreased from 480 minutes [interquartile range (IQR) 420-540] in early cases to 390 minutes (IQR 360-420) in later cases (p=0.03). The operative time for RDSP remained stable at 300 minutes (IQR 240-360; p=0.12). Intraoperative blood loss was 200 mL (IQR 100-400) for RDP and 150 mL (IQR 50-300) for RDSP. Two RDP cases (16.7%) required conversion to open surgery due to vascular adhesions. Postoperative complications included pancreatic fistula in 20% of cases, delayed gastric emptying in 15% of cases and major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥III) in 25% of cases. The median LOS was 10 days (IQR 8-18) for RDP and seven days (IQR 5-10) for RDSP. No 90-day mortality was observed.

Conclusions: Robotic pancreatic resections are feasible and safe during the early learning curve, with morbidity comparable to open surgery. Operative efficiency improved significantly for RDP, highlighting the importance of structured training and case volume. These findings support the adoption of robotic techniques in pancreatic surgery, though further studies are needed to validate long-term outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12347023PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.26574/maedica.2025.20.2.151DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

robotic pancreatic
12
learning curve
12
operative time
12
pancreatic resections
8
cases
8
pancreatic surgery
8
intraoperative blood
8
blood loss
8
postoperative complications
8
minutes iqr
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: There are no reports of patients undergoing McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer after undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. We report the case of a patient who underwent subtotal esophagectomy and colon reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy using the mesenteric approach.

Case Presentation: A 71-year-old male was diagnosed with advanced esophageal cancer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The development of non-Hodgkin lymphoma following liver transplant is rare. We present an unusual case of a 40-year-old female patient with morbid obesity who had undergone a deceased donor liver transplant for an unresectable neuroendocrine tumor of the liver 12 years ago. She presented with a lesion in the tail of pancreas that was suggestive of a recurrent neuroendocrine tumor.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The adoption of robotic pancreatectomy has grown significantly in recent years, driven by its potential advantages in precision, minimally invasive access, and improved patient recovery. However, mastering these complex procedures requires overcoming a substantial learning curve, and the role of structured mentoring in facilitating this transition remains underexplored. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the number of cases required to achieve surgical proficiency, assess the impact of mentoring on skill acquisition, and analyze how outcomes evolve throughout the learning process.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy is gaining success among surgeons also for the increasing use of robotic approach. Ideal candidates are patients with small, confined tumor and dilatated Wirsung duct which is a quite rare clinical conditions: in fact, most of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomies are performed for periampullary cancer, easy to remove but with soft pancreatic remnant and tiny Wirsung duct. The result is the technical challenge of the pancreatico-enteric reconstructions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy by robotic surgery is a safe and feasible surgical technique. Currently, spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy represents an alternative to the classical distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy, in the case of benign and low-grade malignant diseases of the body or pancreas tail. The reasons for preserving the spleen are based on the reduction of postoperative complications, such as post-splenectomy infections, subphrenic abscess, portal thrombosis, pulmonary hypertension, thrombocytosis, and thromboembolism.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF