98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Vinorelbine is commonly used to treat metastatic breast cancer (mBC), while thiotepa is known for its ability to cross the blood-brain barrier.
Methods: Our retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of vinorelbine with or without thiotepa in patients with HER2-negative mBC. We used propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting to ensure comparability between groups.
Results: Vinorelbine-thiotepa was not significantly associated with improved median progression-free survival (PFS) (4.9 vs. 3.0 months, p = 0.138) or median overall survival (OS) (11.8 vs. 11.9 months, p = 0.961) compared to vinorelbine. However, in the central nervous system (CNS) metastasis subgroup, vinorelbine-thiotepa was associated with a longer median PFS (4.9 vs. 2.1 months, p = 0.013) and CNS-PFS (6.12 vs. 2.20 months, p = 0.007). The combination was also associated with a higher rate of grade ≥ 3 adverse events (54.3% vs. 37.9%, p = 0.021).
Conclusion: While no overall benefit in PFS or OS was found, vinorelbine-thiotepa may be associated with improved PFS in mBC patients with CNS metastasis.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12301934 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.71102 | DOI Listing |
Cancer Med
August 2025
Department of Medical Oncology, Sorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, CLIP2 Galilée, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Background: Vinorelbine is commonly used to treat metastatic breast cancer (mBC), while thiotepa is known for its ability to cross the blood-brain barrier.
Methods: Our retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of vinorelbine with or without thiotepa in patients with HER2-negative mBC. We used propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting to ensure comparability between groups.