Validity of the CORE wearable sensor during constant-load cycling exercise in the heat.

Heat exposure is an increasing threat to human health and accurately monitoring core body temperature is vital to avoiding heat-related illnesses during exercise and outdoor occupations. Recently, a wearable device (CORE) was developed to non-invasively estimate core body temperature (T). The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of the CORE sensor and identify subcutaneous fat as a potential contributor to the device's bias. Twenty-four healthy males (n = 13) and females (n = 11) completed 60 min of cycling exercise at 60 % of their maximum aerobic power output (166 ± 46.5 W) in the heat (35.9 °C & 20.7 % relative humidity). During exercise, T and skin temperature (T) measures from the CORE sensor were compared to rectal probe and skin surface probe, respectively. Midaxillary subcutaneous fat thickness (MSFT) at the site of the CORE sensor was measured via ultrasonography. Throughout the entire exercise bout, the CORE displayed a non-statistically significant overestimation of T (0.15 ± 0.43 °C, p = 0.057). However, CORE significantly overestimated T during the third (0.31 ± 0.43 °C, p = 0.002) and fourth (0.36 ± 0.45 °C, p = 0.004) quarters of exercise. CORE also significantly overestimated T (1.28 ± 0.96 °C, p < 0.0001) throughout the entire exercise bout. MSFT was positively correlated with the bias in T (overestimation by CORE) during the third (r = 0.438, p = 0.032) and fourth (r = 0.482, p = 0.017) quarters of exercise. In conclusion, compared to rectal temperature, the CORE sensor overestimated T during constant-load exercise in a hot environment. Overestimated T and local subcutaneous fat may be potential contributors to bias in the CORE sensor's T estimation.