Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

: The Naples prognostic score (NPS), which incorporates inflammatory and nutritional indicators, is increasingly used as a prognostic score for various malignancies. Nonetheless, few studies have specifically evaluated the NPS as a prognostic factor for cervical cancer. This study aimed to assess the value of NPS at diagnosis as a predictor of cancer progression. : This study included patients diagnosed with cervical cancer at Korea University Anam Hospital from January 2019 to December 2023. Patients with incomplete data or those who were lost to follow-up were excluded. The NPS was calculated based on laboratory results at the time of diagnosis, categorizing patients into the low-NPS group (NPS 0-1) and high-NPS group (NPS ≥ 2). Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify independent prognostic factors. : Out of 178 patients, 98 and 80 were categorized into the low-NPS and high-NPS groups, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the high-NPS group had significantly lower disease-free survival (DFS) ( < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) ( = 0.02) rates than the low-NPS group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified the NPS as an independent prognostic factor for DFS (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.98; = 0.017), but not for OS. : This study demonstrated that the NPS measured at diagnosis may serve as a useful independent prognostic factor for cancer progression in patients with cervical cancer.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12387669PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina61081381DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cervical cancer
16
prognostic score
12
cancer progression
12
prognostic factor
12
independent prognostic
12
naples prognostic
8
diagnosis predictor
8
nps
8
low-nps group
8
group nps
8

Similar Publications

The WHO global landscape of cancer clinical trials.

Nat Med

September 2025

Emerging Technology, Research Prioritization and Support Unit, Department of Research for Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Clinical trials are essential to advancing cancer control, yet access and participation remain unequal globally. The World Health Organization (WHO) established the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) to enable a complete view of interventional clinical research for all those involved in healthcare decision-making and to identify actionable goals to equitable participation at the global level. A review of 89,069 global cancer clinical trials registered in the WHO ICTRP between 1999 and December 2022 revealed a cancer clinical trial landscape dominated by high-income countries and focused on pharmacological interventions, with multinational collaboration limited to only 3% of recruiting trials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: More than 20% of cervical cancers are diagnosed in women older than 65 years. Guidelines recommend screening exit at age 65 for average-risk patients only if certain criteria are met, yet most women aged 64-66 years in the United States are inadequately screened. In this mixed methods study, we explored clinician knowledge of exit criteria.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Cervical cancer is a serious threat to women's life and health and has a high mortality rate. Colposcopy is an important method for early clinical cervical cancer screening, but the traditional vaginal dilator has problems such as discomfort in use and cumbersome operation. For this reason, this study aims to design an intelligent vaginal dilatation system to automate colposcopy and enhance patient comfort.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Cancer screening nonadherence persists among adults who are deaf, deafblind, and hard of hearing (DDBHH). These barriers span individual, clinician, and health care system levels, contributing to difficulties understanding cancer information, accessing screening services, and following treatment directives. Critical communication barriers include ineffective patient-physician communication, limited access to American Sign Language (ASL) cancer information, misconceptions about medical procedures, insurance navigation difficulties, and intersectional barriers for multiply marginalized individuals.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Evaluation on the prognostic significance of cervical occult metastasis in cN0 glottic laryngeal cancer.

Oral Oncol

September 2025

Department of Oral Mucosa, Shanghai Stomatological Hospital & School of Stomatology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Craniomaxillofacial Development and Diseases, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. Electronic address:

View Article and Find Full Text PDF