A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

What is the best first-line combination regimen for advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis and systemic review. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Despite significant survival improvements from third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), almost all patients eventually develop resistance. Currently, some studies have confirmed that combination therapy regimens based on third-generation EGFR-TKIs can further enhance efficacy. However, it remains unknown which specific combination regimen is more effective.

Methods: Randomized clinical trials comparing combination treatments involving third-generation EGFR-TKIs vs. EGFR-TKI single agent for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients were included. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Subgroup analyses were also conducted.

Results: The study encompassed 5 trials, involving 1791 patients. The combination of osimertinib with chemotherapy and with ramucirumab, as well as the combination of lazertinib with amivantamab, have been shown to significantly improve PFS compared to osimertinib monotherapy. The combination of osimertinib with chemotherapy and the combination of lazertinib with amivantamab resulted in a significantly higher incidence of TRAEs compared to osimertinib monotherapy and other combination regimens. Osimertinib with chemotherapy showed better PFS in almost all the subgroup analyses. In patients with brain metastases, osimertinib plus chemotherapy appeared to offer clinical benefits over other treatment strategies, although statistical significance was only observed in comparison with osimertinib monotherapy.

Conclusion: This network meta-analysis suggests osimertinib plus pemetrexed-based chemotherapy as the only regimen demonstrating PFS benefits in the whole cohort and almost all the subgroup analyses, making it the optimal treatment for patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Given the higher incidence of grade ≥3 TRAEs, careful consideration is needed in clinical practice.

Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier, CRD42024579401.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12375486PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1572115DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

advanced egfr-mutated
16
osimertinib chemotherapy
16
subgroup analyses
12
combination
9
combination regimen
8
egfr-mutated non-small
8
non-small cell
8
cell lung
8
lung cancer
8
network meta-analysis
8

Similar Publications