98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Breast cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women, highlighting the urgent need for reliable biomarkers that can aid in prognosis and therapeutic stratification.
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the RNA expression levels of four specific genes-, , , and -in breast cancer tumors compared to adjacent normal tissues, and to assess their prognostic significance in relation to clinical parameters and recurrence-free survival.
Materials And Methods: The RNA expression levels of , , , and were examined using SYBR Green real-time PCR. Gene expression data were correlated with clinical parameters, including disease stage, lymph node involvement, and triple-negative status. Survival analysis was conducted to evaluate the prognostic significance of these genes concerning recurrence within five years post-diagnosis, with median expression cutoffs established for each gene and the overall median for the panel. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was employed to assess the relationship between gene expression and recurrence-free survival, calculating hazard ratios (HR) for each gene and the combined panel. Additionally, the Reactome database was analyzed to identify biological pathways associated with these genes.
Results: All four genes demonstrated significantly higher expression levels in breast cancer samples, correlating with advanced disease stages, lymph node involvement, and triple-negative breast cancer status. expression was notably associated with estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) positivity, while expression correlated with ER negativity. Survival analysis revealed that 6 out of 40 patients expired within five years. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that higher expression levels of (HR 14.80, p=0.0015), (HR 9.259, p=0.0071), (HR 12.49, p=0.0027), and (HR 7.315, p=0.0158) were significantly associated with reduced recurrence-free survival. The hazard ratio for the combined gene panel was 15.367 (p<0.0001). Reactome analysis revealed that these genes are involved in critical biological pathways, including actin folding by CCT TriC and TP53 regulation of G1 cell cycle arrest.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that this four-gene panel holds significant promise as a robust prognostic tool for breast cancer survival. This research paves the way for further investigations into targeted therapies and personalized medicine approaches in the management of breast cancer.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12374123 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.30498/ijb.2025.497569.4051 | DOI Listing |
JCO Glob Oncol
May 2025
Department of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Purpose: Breast cancer remains a significant public health challenge globally, as well as in India, where it is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in females. Significant disparities in incidence, mortality, and access to health care across India's sociodemographically diverse population highlight the need for increased awareness, policy reform, and research.
Design: This review consolidates data from national cancer registries, global cancer databases, and institutional findings from a tertiary care center to examine the epidemiology, clinical challenges, and management gaps specific to India.
J Med Screen
September 2025
The Cancer Registry of Norway, Department of Screening programs, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
ObjectiveTo study the implications of implementing artificial intelligence (AI) as a decision support tool in the Norwegian breast cancer screening program concerning cost-effectiveness and time savings for radiologists.MethodsIn a decision tree model using recent data from AI vendors and the Cancer Registry of Norway, and assuming equal effectiveness of radiologists plus AI compared to standard practice, we simulated costs, effects and radiologist person-years over the next 20 years under different scenarios: 1) Assuming a €1 additional running cost of AI instead of the €3 assumed in the base case, 2) varying the AI-score thresholds for single vs. double readings, 3) varying the consensus and recall rates, and 4) reductions in the interval cancer rate compared to standard practice.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Natl Cancer Inst
September 2025
Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, United States.
Background: Among childhood cancer survivors, germline rare variants in autosomal dominant cancer susceptibility genes (AD CSGs) could increase subsequent neoplasm (SNs) risks, but risks for rarer SNs and by age at onset are not well understood.
Methods: We pooled the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study and St Jude Lifetime Cohort (median follow-up = 29.7 years, range 7.
PLoS One
September 2025
Institute of Computational Science and Technology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are critical regulators of gene expression in cancer biology, yet their spatial dynamics within tumor microenvironments (TMEs) remain underexplored due to technical limitations in current spatial transcriptomics (ST) technologies. To address this gap, we present STmiR, a novel XGBoost-based framework for spatially resolved miRNA activity prediction. STmiR integrates bulk RNA-seq data (TCGA and CCLE) with spatial transcriptomics profiles to model nonlinear miRNA-mRNA interactions, achieving high predictive accuracy (Spearman's ρ > 0.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPLoS One
September 2025
Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Objective: This study employs integrated network toxicology and molecular docking to investigate the molecular basis underlying 4-nonylphenol (4-NP)-mediated enhancement of breast cancer susceptibility.
Methods: We integrated data from multiple databases, including ChEMBL, STITCH, Swiss Target Prediction, GeneCards, OMIM and TTD. Core compound-disease-associated target genes were identified through Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) network analysis.