98%
921
2 minutes
20
Emerging treatments for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR, NEJM391(2):122-132) have increased the importance of ABMR detection when donor-specific antibody (DSA) is negative. We addressed this issue in the Trifecta-Kidney study (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT04239703) using three centralized tests in 690 kidney transplant biopsies: DSA (One Lambda Inc.), blood donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA, Prospera™ test, Natera, Inc.), and molecular biopsy assessment (MMDx). We used an "AutoBanff 2022" algorithm to model the impact of alternative DSA interpretations on the histologic diagnosis of "DSA-negative" ABMR following Banff guidelines, including agreement with dd-cfDNA and molecular ABMR. Lowering MFI cutoffs for DSA-positivity did not improve detection of DSA-negative ABMR. However, simply calling all DSA positive allowed Banff 2022 guidelines to identify 46% more ABMR cases with no measurable DSA, and per Net Reclassification Improvement increased agreement between histologic diagnoses and both dd-cfDNA (P=7.72E-7) and molecular ABMR (P=7.69E-7). New ABMR cases were as strongly positive for dd-cfDNA and molecular ABMR as those found using the conventional DSA interpretation. A validation set analysis using INTERCOMEX study data (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT#01299168) confirmed these findings, and found that the new DSA-negative ABMR cases identified by calling all DSA positive had the same risk for graft loss as those found with conventional DSA interpretation. Trifecta-Kidney Study ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT04239703.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajt.2025.08.029 | DOI Listing |
Am J Transplant
August 2025
Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada. Electronic address:
Emerging treatments for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR, NEJM391(2):122-132) have increased the importance of ABMR detection when donor-specific antibody (DSA) is negative. We addressed this issue in the Trifecta-Kidney study (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT04239703) using three centralized tests in 690 kidney transplant biopsies: DSA (One Lambda Inc.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFKidney Int Rep
June 2025
Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Introduction: Molecular classifiers are a promising tool to refine the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) after kidney transplantation. Despite this potential, the integration of molecular classifiers in transplant clinics has been slow, in part because of the complexity of current assays and lack of a consensus platform. Herein, we aimed to develop and validate sparse molecular classifiers for ABMR and TCMR using allograft tissue.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Mol Sci
June 2025
Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Padua University Hospital, 35128 Padua, Italy.
While the pathogenic role of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) in long-term immune-mediated injury after kidney transplantation is well established, the clinical relevance of non-donor-specific antibodies (nDSAs), also detected in transplant recipients, remains a subject of debate. This retrospective study evaluated the prognostic value of nDSAs in 92 pediatric kidney transplant recipients (89.1%, 9.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTranspl Int
June 2025
Transplantation Laboratory, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czechia.
Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) are commonly used in peri-transplant desensitization, but evidence supporting their efficacy is limited. We conducted a prospective, randomized single-center, open-label, Phase IIIb non-inferiority clinical pilot trial to compare the efficacy of IVIG (administered at a dose of 3 × 0.5 g/kg) versus no IVIG, in conjunction with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (5-7 mg/kg) induction, in pre-sensitized patients with donor-specific antibodies who had negative pre-transplantation Flow- and CDC-crossmatches, between July 2020 and November 2022.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFKidney Int Rep
April 2025
Renal Division, Transplantation Research Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Introduction: We recently discovered 2 urinary exosomal mRNA signatures to identify and differentiate T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) from antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in kidney transplant recipients. Here, we developed Exosome Transplant Rejection Urine (ExoTRU), a urinetest based on a 4-gene signature from the previous discovery cohort, showed its clinical utility in a new cohort of kidney transplant recipients undergoing clinically indicated biopsies, and validated it through a separate laboratory in an independent-cohort of patients.
Methods: A workflow suited for clinical laboratories was developed, allowing for smaller urine volumes and widely standardized qPCR instrumentation.