A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Venous Port implantation in persistent left superior vena cava with azygos vein variation: a case report and literature review. | LitMetric

Venous Port implantation in persistent left superior vena cava with azygos vein variation: a case report and literature review.

BMC Surg

Department of Vascular Surgery, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of School of Medicine, and International School of Medicine, International Institutes of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Yiwu, 322000, China.

Published: August 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Persistent left superior vena cava catheterization for venous port is still sporadically reported, let alone combined with variations of the azygos.

Case Presentation: During the implantation of a venous access port in a 73-year-old patient, who was planned to carry out postoperative chemotherapy, a persistent left superior vena cava was discovered. A review of the preoperative plain chest computed tomography further corroborated the existence of a double superior vena cavas. Besides, the right azygos vein was absent and a left azygos vein draining into the persistent left superior vena cava was evident. The diameter of the persistent left superior vena cava was greater than that of the right SVC. Consequently, the decision was made to insert the catheter into the persistent left superior vena cava for the subsequent implantation procedures. The surgery was successful and no complications related to the venous port occurred during the whole catheter days.

Conclusions: The rare persistent left superior vena cava with variant azygos vein should not be a contraindication for venous port implantation after a comprehensive evaluation.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12893-025-03144-9.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12376719PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-03144-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

superior vena
32
persistent left
28
left superior
28
vena cava
28
venous port
16
azygos vein
16
port implantation
8
left
8
superior
8
vena
8

Similar Publications