Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Anatomical changes in head-and-neck cancer (HNC) patients during intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) can shift the Bragg Peak of proton beams, risking tumor underdosing and organ-at-risk (OAR) overdosing. As a result, treatment replanning is often required to maintain clinically acceptable treatment quality. However, current manual replanning processes are often resource intensive and time consuming. In this work, we propose a patient-specific deep reinforcement learning (DRL) framework for automated IMPT replanning, with a reward-shaping mechanism based on a 150-point plan quality score designed to handle competing clinical objectives in radiotherapy planning. We formulate the planning process as a reinforcement learning (RL) problem where agents learn high-dimensional control policies to adjust plan optimization priorities to maximize plan quality. Unlike population-based approaches, our framework trains personalized agents for each patient using their planning Computed Tomography (CT) and augmented anatomies simulating anatomical changes (tumor progression and regression). This patient-specific approach leverages anatomical similarities along the treatment course, enabling effective plan adaptation. We implemented and compared two DRL algorithms, Deep Q-Network (DQN) and Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), using dose-volume histograms (DVHs) as state representations and a 22-dimensional action space of priority adjustments. Evaluation on eight HNC patients using actual replanning CT data showed that both DRL agents improved initial plan scores from 120.78 ± 17.18 to 139.59 ± 5.50 (DQN) and 141.50 ± 4.69 (PPO), surpassing the replans manually generated by a human planner (136.32±4.79). Further comparison of dosimetric endpoints confirms these improvements translate to better tumor coverage and OAR sparing across diverse anatomical changes. This work highlights the potential of DRL in addressing the geometric and dosimetric complexities of adaptive proton therapy, offering a promising solution for efficient offline adaptation and paving the way for online adaptive proton therapy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12364053 | PMC |