A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Non-linear association between aneurysm size ratio and in-stent stenosis after flow diverter treatment: A retrospective cohort study of patients with unruptured aneurysms. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background And Purpose: Flow diversion (FD) treatment has emerged as an effective endovascular therapy for intracranial aneurysms, but in-stent stenosis remains a significant complication affecting patient outcomes. The size ratio (SR) of aneurysms may influence this outcome, but their relationship remains unclear. We investigate the association between intracranial aneurysm SR and in-stent stenosis after FD treatment.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 217 patients with unruptured aneurysms who underwent with flow-diversion treatment from January 2020 to January 2022. SR was the exposure variable, and in-stent stenosis within one year was the outcome. Covariates included demographic, clinical, and procedural factors. Binary logistic regression and two-piecewise linear models were used for analysis.

Results: Using binary logistic regression, we found that for every increase in SR by 1, there was on average an associated with a 37 % reduction in stenosis risk (RR = 0.63, 95 %CI: 0.40-0.99, P = 0.046). Further two-piecewise linear regression analysis identified a piecewise linear relationship between SR and in-stent stenosis with a threshold effect at SR = 3.50 (P for log likelihood ratio test = 0.037). In the low SR range (≤3.50), each unit increase in SR was significantly associated with a 54 % lower risk of in-stent stenosis (adjusted RR = 0.46, 95 % CI: 0.25-0.85, P = 0.013) after adjusting for potential confounders. However, in the high SR range (>3.50), this association became non-significant (adjusted RR = 1.56, 95 % CI: 0.51-4.77, P = 0.438).

Conclusion: The relationship between aneurysm SR and in-stent stenosis risk demonstrates a piecewise linear pattern with a threshold effect at SR = 3.50. Among aneurysms with SR values of 3.50 or less, each unit increase in SR corresponded to a 54 % decrease in stenosis risk.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2025.108423DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

in-stent stenosis
28
stenosis risk
12
stenosis
9
size ratio
8
retrospective cohort
8
cohort study
8
patients unruptured
8
unruptured aneurysms
8
aneurysm in-stent
8
binary logistic
8

Similar Publications