A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

The lung immune prognostic index stratifies the occurrence of checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients: a multi-institutional cohort study. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) is associated with survival outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving immunotherapy, but the association with the occurrence of checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) is unclear.

Methods: We retrospectively included 1824 patients with advanced NSCLC who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) at two institutions. Cox regression analysis and cumulative incidence curve were used to evaluate the predictive value of LIPI. Additionally, we performed competing risk analysis using Fine-Gray regression and cumulative incidence curves.

Results: During a median follow-up of 15 months, 99 patients developed CIP. Compared with the good LIPI group, the intermediate LIPI group (HR 1.87, P = 0.007) and poor LIPI group (HR 4.39, P < 0.001) had a higher risk of CIP. Furthermore, we found LIPI was an independent predictor for intermediate-grade CIP (intermediate LIPI: HR 2.11, P = 0.056; poor LIPI: HR 4.51, P = 0.002) and high-grade CIP (intermediate LIPI: HR 6.94, P = 0.014; poor LIPI: HR 44.01, P < 0.001), but not for low-grade CIP (intermediate LIPI: HR 1.31, P = 0.392; poor LIPI: HR 0.72, P = 0.656). Similar results were obtained after competing risk analysis.

Conclusions: LIPI grade shows potential in predicting the risk of CIP during immunotherapy and could be valuable in clinical management.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-025-03124-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lipi group
12
lung immune
8
immune prognostic
8
occurrence checkpoint
8
checkpoint inhibitor
8
inhibitor pneumonitis
8
non-small cell
8
cell lung
8
lung cancer
8
cumulative incidence
8

Similar Publications