A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Development and validation of equations to estimate the body fat percentage in older adults using anthropometric measurements and portable a-mode ultrasound. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background & Aims: Considering the importance of accurate methods for assessing body fat in older adults, this study aimed to develop and validate equations for estimating body fat percentage (%BF) using portable A-mode ultrasound (US) and anthropometric data in older adults.

Methods: A total of 149 healthy older adults (≥60 years old) were included in the cross-sectional study. Three-fourths (n = 111) were randomly assigned to the development sample and one-fourth to the validation sample (n = 38). Prediction equations using body mass index (BMI), sex, triceps, subscapular, abdominal, and anterior thigh subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT), and thigh circumference (TC) were generated for the development sample through multiple regression analysis and validated through the validation sample.

Results: Three equations were developed, the first with six parameters (R = 0.78; SEE = 3.05), the second with the same six parameters as the first plus thigh circumference (R = 0.80; SEE = 2.96), and the third with three parameters (R = 0.77; SEE = 3.19). There was no statistical difference between the %BF estimated by the equations developed using portable A-mode US and the %BF estimated by Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in the development and validation samples. The three equations showed mean errors from 0.16 to 0.27 % and agreement limits from -5.89 to 6.28 %.

Conclusion: The best model had sex, BMI, triceps, subscapular, abdominal, anterior thigh SFT, and TC as predictor variables. The equation with only one US measurement (triceps SFT) could be an option for estimating %BF in clinical practice due to its practicality and quickness.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.08.012DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

body fat
12
older adults
12
portable a-mode
12
development validation
8
fat percentage
8
a-mode ultrasound
8
development sample
8
triceps subscapular
8
subscapular abdominal
8
abdominal anterior
8

Similar Publications