A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Deep learning-based non-invasive prediction of PD-L1 status and immunotherapy survival stratification in esophageal cancer using [F]FDG PET/CT. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to develop and validate deep learning models using [F]FDG PET/CT to predict PD-L1 status in esophageal cancer (EC) patients. Additionally, we assessed the potential of derived deep learning model scores (DLS) for survival stratification in immunotherapy.

Methods: In this retrospective study, we included 331 EC patients from two centers, dividing them into training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts. Fifty patients who received immunotherapy were followed up. We developed four 3D ResNet10-based models-PET + CT + clinical factors (CPC), PET + CT (PC), PET (P), and CT (C)-using pre-treatment [F]FDG PET/CT scans. For comparison, we also constructed a logistic model incorporating clinical factors (clinical model). The DLS were evaluated as radiological markers for survival stratification, and nomograms for predicting survival were constructed.

Results: The models demonstrated accurate prediction of PD-L1 status. The areas under the curve (AUCs) for predicting PD-L1 status were as follows: CPC (0.927), PC (0.904), P (0.886), C (0.934), and the clinical model (0.603) in the training cohort; CPC (0.882), PC (0.848), P (0.770), C (0.745), and the clinical model (0.524) in the internal validation cohort; and CPC (0.843), PC (0.806), P (0.759), C (0.667), and the clinical model (0.671) in the external validation cohort. The CPC and PC models exhibited superior predictive performance. Survival analysis revealed that the DLS from most models effectively stratified overall survival and progression-free survival at appropriate cut-off points (P < 0.05), outperforming stratification based on PD-L1 status (combined positive score ≥ 10). Furthermore, incorporating model scores with clinical factors in nomograms enhanced the predictive probability of survival after immunotherapy.

Conclusion: Deep learning models based on [F]FDG PET/CT can accurately predict PD-L1 status in esophageal cancer patients. The derived DLS can effectively stratify survival outcomes following immunotherapy, particularly when combined with clinical factors.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-025-07463-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pd-l1 status
16
clinical model
16
survival stratification
12
[f]fdg pet/ct
12
cohort cpc
12
prediction pd-l1
8
esophageal cancer
8
deep learning
8
internal validation
8
external validation
8

Similar Publications