A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Total aortic arch replacement using the Thoraflex Hybrid device: evolution from investigational to federally approved use in the United States. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: After the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the Thoraflex Hybrid device in April 2022, hybrid devices to facilitate total arch replacement (TAR) became commercially available in the United States. However, little is known about how the Thoraflex device has been used since then. We present our experience (2016-2025) with this device.

Methods: At our practice, 62 patients [median age, 65 (54-73) years] underwent frozen elephant trunk (FET) TAR with the Thoraflex device: 14 under an investigational device exemption (IDE) (2016-2018) and 48 after FDA approval (2022-2025). Both Ante-Flo (straight) and Plexus (branched) models were used.

Results: Patients with aortic dissection were common (n=38; 61%). Many patients had prior open or endovascular aortic repair (n=28; 45%). Initial cannulation was commonly done via the innominate artery (n=30; 48%) or the right axillary artery (n=22; 36%). Both branched and island strategies were used to reattach the brachiocephalic arteries. Selectively, left subclavian artery (LSCA) bypass was performed before TAR in 18 patients (29%). The distal anastomosis was performed proximal to the LSCA in 27 repairs (43%). A short (10-cm) endograft extension was used in most cases (n=49; 79%). Eight (13%) patients underwent concomitant aortic root replacement. Overall, four patients (7%) had operative deaths, and three (5%) were discharged with stroke or persistent need for renal dialysis. Two patients had spinal cord deficits that resolved before discharge. Twenty-five downstream extensions (12 open, 13 endovascular) were needed in 22 patients; two patients underwent more than one repair. After discharge, seven additional patients died within one year of surgery.

Conclusions: TAR is a complex procedure. Patients requiring such repair tend to have substantial disease that often eventually necessitates subsequent downstream aortic repair, especially when dissection is present. Using the Thoraflex Hybrid device in TAR results in good early outcomes and provides a reliable base for extension.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12343152PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/acs-2025-evet-0070DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

thoraflex hybrid
12
hybrid device
12
patients
11
arch replacement
8
united states
8
thoraflex device
8
open endovascular
8
aortic repair
8
patients underwent
8
device
6

Similar Publications