98%
921
2 minutes
20
Midfacial fractures are common outcomes of facial trauma. While younger individuals typically sustain these injuries through high-energy events like assaults and traffic or sports accidents, elderly patients increasingly present with fractures from low-energy mechanisms, primarily falls. The aim of this study was to analyze age- and gender-specific patterns in midfacial fractures over a 10-year period, with emphasis on elderly individuals and low-energy trauma. A retrospective review was performed of proven midfacial fractures between 2013 and 2022 at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (University of Pécs, Hungary). The patients were stratified by age (<65 vs. ≥65 years) and gender. The variables included the injury mechanism, fracture localization, the dental status, hospitalization, and the presence of associated injuries. Bivariate analyses were performed, and the significance level was set to < 0.05. A total of 957 radiologically confirmed midfacial fracture cases were evaluated, of whom 344 (35.9%) were ≥65 years old. In the elderly group, females had a 19-fold higher risk for midfacial trauma than younger females (OR: 19.1, 95%CI: 9.30-39.21). In the older group, a fall was significantly the most frequent injury mechanism (OR: 14.5; 95%CI: 9.9-21.3), responsible for 89.5% of the cases, while hospitalization (OR: 0.36; 95%CI: 0.23-0.56) was less characteristic. Most of the fractures occurred in the zygomatic bone, in the zygomaticomaxillary complex, or in the anterior wall of the maxilla. Associated injuries in the elderly group included mostly lower limb injuries-particularly pertrochanteric femoral fractures in females-and upper limb injuries, with a slight male dominance. Low-energy falls are the primary cause of midfacial fractures in elderly patients, particularly in women. Tailored prevention and management strategies are essential for improving the outcomes in this growing demographic group.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12346994 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155396 | DOI Listing |
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg
September 2025
Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Background: Craniomaxillofacial (CMF) trauma constitutes a significant proportion of hospital presentations, often resulting from high-energy mechanisms such as interpersonal violence and traffic accidents. The COVID-19 pandemic and associated public health restrictions markedly altered daily life and social behavior, potentially influencing trauma patterns and emergency healthcare utilization.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of nationwide anonymized inpatient data from German hospitals, reported to the National Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK), covering the period from March 18, 2019 to March 17, 2023.
J Clin Med
July 2025
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary.
Midfacial fractures are common outcomes of facial trauma. While younger individuals typically sustain these injuries through high-energy events like assaults and traffic or sports accidents, elderly patients increasingly present with fractures from low-energy mechanisms, primarily falls. The aim of this study was to analyze age- and gender-specific patterns in midfacial fractures over a 10-year period, with emphasis on elderly individuals and low-energy trauma.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOral Maxillofac Surg
August 2025
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, JSS Dental College and Hospital, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru, Karnataka, 570015, India.
Purpose: The ZMC provides essential midfacial support through its tetrapod configuration and current clinical practice lacks consensus on optimal fixation techniques for displaced fractures. This study compared stress distribution and deformation patterns across different ZMC fracture fixation methods to provide biomechanical guidance for clinical decision-making.
Methods: This finite element analysis (FEA) study was conducted using computer-generated ZMC models derived from CBCT scans of normal anatomy.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg
July 2025
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Purpose: To determine whether physicians can accurately assess maxillofacial injury patients for the presence of fractures using a standardized clinical examination protocol, and to evaluate differences in assessment accuracy across experience levels.
Method: A prospective observational cohort study was conducted in four hospital emergency departments of patients with maxillofacial injuries. Physicians rated fracture probability twice on a 0-10 scale: first based on visual signs before the clinical examination, and again after the standardized clinical examination consisting of 15 midfacial or 14 mandibular parameters.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
September 2025
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Royal London Hospital. E1 1BB, United Kingdom. Electronic address:
Advances in surgical techniques and materials have improved midface fracture management, with miniplate fixation replacing traditional intermaxillary fixation (IMF). This study evaluates whether IMF remains necessary, focusing on postoperative malocclusion and the impact of fracture complexity, demographics, and operative techniques on patient outcomes. A retrospective observational analysis of 100 midface trauma cases requiring surgical fixation was conducted at a major trauma centre in London.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF