A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Comparison between femoral nerve block and pericapsular nerve group block as preemptive analgesia in geriatric intertrochanteric fractures: A prospective randomised controlled clinical trial. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: Regional blocks such as femoral nerve block (FNB) and Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block are frequently used for postoperative pain relief in fractures around the hip joint. This study compares the analgesic efficacy of PENG block with FNB in the management of intertrochanteric fractures.

Methods: This randomised controlled clinical trial included patients aged 65-80 years with intertrochanteric fractures who were planned for closed reduction and cephalomedullary nailing. The patients were randomised into two groups: Group 1 (n = 40) received FNB, while Group 2 (n = 40) received PENG block preoperatively. The outcome measures were postoperative VAS score, total opioid consumption, quadriceps power, and duration of mobilisation.

Results: There was a significant reduction in postoperative pain in both groups. A comparison between the FNB and PENG blocks showed no significant difference in VAS scores at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 h. The PENG group had better quadriceps strength preservation at 12 h (p < 0.05), with no significant difference between the two groups at 60 h. The total opioid consumption in the first 48 h was similar in both groups (8.03 Morphine milliequivalents (MME) in PENG and 7.07 MME in the FNB group, p-value >0.05).

Conclusion: PENG block and FNB are equally effective in pain relief and in reducing opioid requirements in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures. However, the PENG group showed better preservation of quadriceps strength at 12 h.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12336660PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2025.07.026DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

peng block
16
intertrochanteric fractures
12
block fnb
12
femoral nerve
8
nerve block
8
pericapsular nerve
8
nerve group
8
randomised controlled
8
controlled clinical
8
clinical trial
8

Similar Publications