Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

The phase problem is a well known ill-posed reconstruction problem of coherent lens-less microscopic imaging, where only the intensities of a complex wave-field are measured by the detector and the phase information is lost. For the reconstruction of sharp images from holograms in a near-field experimental setting, it is crucial to solve the autofocus problem, i.e., to precisely estimate the Fresnel number of the forward model. Otherwise, blurred out-of focus images that also can contain artifacts are the result. In general, a simple distance measurement at the experiment is not sufficiently accurate, thus the fine-tuning of the Fresnel number has to be done prior to the actual reconstructions. This can be done manually or automatically by an estimation algorithm. To automatize the process, as needed, e.g., for experiments, different focus criteria have been widely studied in literature but are subjected to certain restrictions. The methods often rely on image analysis of the reconstructed image, making them sensitive to image noise and also neglecting algorithmic properties of the applied phase retrieval. In this paper, we propose a novel criterion, based on a model-matching approach, which improves autofocusing by also taking the underlying reconstruction algorithm, the forward model and the measured hologram into account. We derive a common autofocusing framework, based on a recent phase-retrieval approach and a downhill-simplex method for the automatic optimization of the Fresnel number. We further demonstrate the robustness of the framework on different data sets obtained at the nano imaging endstation of P05 at PETRA III (DESY, Hamburg) operated by Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.544573DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fresnel number
12
phase retrieval
8
forward model
8
model-based autofocus
4
autofocus near-field
4
phase
4
near-field phase
4
retrieval phase
4
phase problem
4
problem well
4

Similar Publications

The phase problem is a well known ill-posed reconstruction problem of coherent lens-less microscopic imaging, where only the intensities of a complex wave-field are measured by the detector and the phase information is lost. For the reconstruction of sharp images from holograms in a near-field experimental setting, it is crucial to solve the autofocus problem, i.e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In high-power laser systems, optical component damage in the final optics system remains a critical factor limiting output capability. One of the primary causes of this damage is the nonlinear enhancement of the optical field, particularly the hot-image effect. The hot image effect is formed downstream due to the interaction between diffracted light from a defect and background light in a nonlinear self-focusing medium.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Optical scanning holography (OSH) is one of the single-pixel imaging (SPI) techniques. Although OSH can obtain an incoherent hologram using a single-pixel detector, OSH needs a complicated optical setup to generate Fresnel zone patterns (FZPs). Computational OSH (COSH) has been proposed to overcome the complexity of OSH by using a spatial light modulator (SLM).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

To analyze the effects of various aspects on the outcome of a microlens array (MLA)-based homogenizer, an angular spectrum method (ASM)-based toolkit was developed for designing the MLA-based homogenizer and introduced in this study. A finer rotating diffuser model was developed to more accurately model a practical diffuser and enhance the comprehension of the temporal integral. An intuitive algorithm was used to simulate the entire temporal integration process.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We investigate the wavelength-dependent focal length of singlet metalenses, highlighting the physical mechanisms that influence it. We present calculation methods to quantify the contribution of each effect and apply them to three distinct metalenses. The results reveal significant variations in focal length with wavelength and lens diameter, driven primarily by diffraction.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF