A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Machine learning-based identification of key biotic and abiotic drivers of mineral weathering rate in a complex enhanced weathering experiment. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: The optimization of enhanced mineral weathering as a carbon dioxide removal technology requires a comprehensive understanding of what drives mineral weathering. These drivers can be abiotic and biotic and can interact with each other. Therefore, in this study, an extensive 8-week column experiment was set up to investigate 30 potential drivers of mineral weathering simultaneously.

Methods: The setup included various combinations of rock types and surface areas, irrigation settings, biochar and organic amendments, along with various biota and biotic products such as earthworms, fungi, bacteria and enzymes; each varying in type or species and quantity. The resulting changes in dissolved, solid, and total inorganic carbon (∆TIC), and total alkalinity were calculated as indicators of carbon dioxide removal through mineral weathering. Three machine learning models, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), Random Forest and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) regression, were used to predict these indicators. Dominant drivers of the best performing model were investigated using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).

Results: SHAP analysis revealed that each CDR indicator was influenced by different factors. However, key drivers were consistently abiotic, though biota also made a significant contribution to the predictions. The most representative CDR indicator, ∆TIC, was predominantly driven by steel slag addition and mixed rock grain sizes but was also substantially impacted by earthworms and microbes.

Conclusions: These findings provide valuable insights into the complex interplay of numerous abiotic and biotic factors that affect mineral weathering, highlighting the potential of machine learning to unravel complex relationships in biogeochemical systems.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12338168PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.19252.2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mineral weathering
24
drivers mineral
8
carbon dioxide
8
dioxide removal
8
abiotic biotic
8
machine learning
8
cdr indicator
8
weathering
7
mineral
6
drivers
5

Similar Publications