A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Effects of Individualized Positive End-Expiratory Pressure on Patients Undergoing One-Lung Ventilation During Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) versus fixed PEEP on postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), intraoperative oxygenation, and respiratory mechanics in thoracic surgery. One-lung ventilation (OLV) poses potential risks of PPCs. PEEP may mitigate lung injury, but the optimal PEEP level remains uncertain.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing individualized PEEP versus fixed PEEP during OLV published up to December 2024. The primary outcome was the occurrence of overall PPCs during hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included postoperative hypoxemia, atelectasis, pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), intraoperative oxygenation, dynamic compliance, driving pressure, and hospital length of stay. Risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences were calculated using the DerSimonian-Laird method. Study quality was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool version 2 for RCTs trials. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was used to assess result reliability.

Results: Six RCTs (with a total of 1,844 patients) were included, with 5 studies (1,814 patients) reporting PPCs. Individualized PEEP did not significantly reduce overall PPCs (RR, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-1.03; p = 0.08), hypoxemia, pneumonia, or atelectasis; however, it reduced postoperative ARDS and improved intraoperative oxygenation and lung compliance. TSA revealed that the current sample size of 1,814 in PPCs was below the required 3,660, and that the z-curve did not cross the TSA monitoring boundaries.

Conclusions: Individualized PEEP in thoracic surgery may improve intraoperative oxygenation, pulmonary mechanics, and reduce postoperative ARDS but does not significantly lower overall PPCs. Overall, the quality of the evidence is low and inconclusive, and further investigation is warranted.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2025.06.019DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intraoperative oxygenation
16
thoracic surgery
12
individualized peep
12
individualized positive
8
positive end-expiratory
8
end-expiratory pressure
8
one-lung ventilation
8
peep
8
peep versus
8
versus fixed
8

Similar Publications