Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

BackgroundIncorporating clinician and patient perspectives in the measurement of shared decision making (SDM) is aligned with SDM's inherently dyadic nature. There are no tools measuring SDM in pediatrics from multiple perspectives. The objective of this study was to develop a tool to measure SDM from the perspectives of both clinicians and parents of young children.DesignWe used a stepwise iterative approach to tool development beginning with de novo item generation and followed by augmentation of the item pool by adapting items from existing instruments. After the study team removed redundant items, 3 parents and 3 SDM experts rated the remaining items for their ability to capture SDM in pediatrics; items with the lowest mean ratings were removed. To assess the preliminary tool's face validity, usability, and item understandability, we pretested it, revising it iteratively, with sequential cohorts of English-speaking parents and clinicians from 2 US children's hospitals.ResultsWe generated an initial list of 28 items for the parent and clinician versions of the tool, which we reduced to 20 items after preliminary review. After review by parents and SDM experts, we cut 9 items and added 1 additional item for a total of 12 items. We pretested the preliminary tool with 31 clinicians and 30 parents across 3 sequential cohorts. The final tool contained 12 items and an optional free-text item.LimitationsAll participants were English speaking, limiting its generalizability.ConclusionsWe have developed a usable preliminary tool for measuring the dyadic process of SDM in pediatrics.ImplicationsThis tool represents an important first step toward addressing the measurement of SDM in pediatrics from multiple perspectives.HighlightsIn this study, we have developed the first shared decision making (SDM) tool specifically for use with parents of young children.Although further study is needed to determine the psychometric properties of this tool, it has the potential to address an important gap in our ability to measure SDM in pediatrics from multiple perspectives.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X251353216DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sdm pediatrics
16
shared decision
12
decision making
12
pediatrics multiple
12
sdm
10
tool
9
items
9
tool measure
8
dyadic process
8
making sdm
8

Similar Publications

Characterizing How Pediatric Clinicians Create Choice Awareness When Performing Shared Decision-Making.

Acad Pediatr

August 2025

Division of Bioethics and Palliative and Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine and Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics and Palliative Care, Seattle Children's Research Institute, 1900 Ninth Ave, M/S: JMB-6; Seattle, WA, USA 9810

Objective: To characterize how clinicians create choice awareness when performing shared decision-making (SDM).

Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional observational study designed to characterize the decision-making processes of parents and clinicians across a range of medical decisions in different pediatric settings. For the observational study, clinicians were recruited from 6 pediatric specialties (craniofacial, hematology and oncology, hospital medicine, neonatology, pulmonary, and sports medicine) at a single US children's hospital.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Osteoporosis is a prevalent condition among postmenopausal women, significantly increasing the risk of fragility fractures. Despite the availability of clinical guidelines, their implementation in primary care, remains highly variable, particularly regarding fracture prevention and shared decision-making (SDM).

Methods: We conducted a qualitative study to explore the attitudes and practices of Spanish family physicians in preventing fractures among postmenopausal women.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The management of pediatric severe asthma poses significant challenges for families. When faced with the choice between targeted biologics like omalizumab and widely used complementary alternative medicine (CAM), families navigate a complex decision-making process influenced by multiple factors. This review adopts a family-centered perspective to systematically analyze key factors influencing this trade-off: treatment goals (extending beyond clinical metrics to focus on quality of life), risk perception (shaped by subjective constructs and lacking direct evidence for comparative risk assessments), treatment burden (often overlooked hidden costs), and the current state of shared decision-making (SDM).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

BackgroundIncorporating clinician and patient perspectives in the measurement of shared decision making (SDM) is aligned with SDM's inherently dyadic nature. There are no tools measuring SDM in pediatrics from multiple perspectives. The objective of this study was to develop a tool to measure SDM from the perspectives of both clinicians and parents of young children.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Pediatric nutrition is crucial for the prevention of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), which increasingly impact children and adolescents worldwide. Nutritional interventions during early childhood, such as exclusive breastfeeding in the first six months and the introduction of nutrient-rich complementary foods thereafter, lay the foundation for lifelong prevention of chronic diseases. The growing global burden of NCDs, including obesity, cardiovascular diseases, and diabetes, highlights the urgent need for effective public health strategies to promote healthy dietary habits and physical activity among young populations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF