Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Purpose: This study aimed to elucidate the molecular and genetic factors contributing to negative Ga-DOTATATE PET imaging in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). By integrating whole exome sequencing (WES) and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), we sought to unravel the interplay between negative results of Ga-DOTATATE PET and genetic mutations in NETs.
Methods: A total of 18 patients with lung, ileal, or pancreatic NETs who underwent Ga-DOTATATE and F-FDG PET/CT scans as part of their initial diagnostic workup were retrospectively reviewed. WES analysis was conducted to investigate the genetic profile of circulating tumor cells of patients with negative Ga-DOTATATE scans. Leveraging scRNA-seq and single-cell somatic variant calling analysis, we compared the mutation burden and genetic hallmarks of NET cells with high /positive SSTR2 expression to those with negative/low SSTR2 expression.
Results: Our analysis identified an association between negative Ga-DOTATATE scans and reduced survival rates, regardless of tumor grade. WES highlighted a predominance of missense mutations, including CREBBP mutation, particularly in patients with negative PET results (incidence of %67 vs. %0). We observed a deleterious mutation in the SSTR2, likely accounting for the observed negative PET scans (incidence of %33). Single-cell single nucleotide variant (SNV) analysis showed that the total unique mutation burden in cells with negative/low SSTR2 expression was significantly higher compared to cells with positive/high expression; and notably, the CREBBP mutation was observed in more than 50% of patients and approximately 35% of NET cells. These results indicate that the frequency of CREBBP mutations is nearly as high as other well-known NET mutations such as MEN1, PTEN, and RB1. Additionally, CREBBP mutations are significantly more frequent in tumors with negative/low SSTR2 expression.
Conclusion: This study suggests that CREBBP mutations in NETs may potentially alter SSTR2 expression, indicating that patients with the mutated CREBBP genotype may not be suitable candidates for SSTR2-targeted PET imaging and radionuclide therapy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11307-025-02040-1 | DOI Listing |