Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Importance: A lack of transparent reporting of race and ethnicity in clinical research limits the ability to identify health inequities and evaluate to what extent clinical research includes diverse populations.

Objective: To identify study characteristics associated with reporting race and ethnicity of clinical study participants and to document temporal trends in race and ethnicity reporting on clinicaltrials.gov.

Design: Cross-sectional analysis of interventional trials and observational studies from 2009-2024; multivariable logistic regression assessed study-level factors associated with reporting race and ethnicity.

Setting: Global registry of clinical studies (clinicaltrials.gov).

Participants: 58,163 studies with posted results and without early termination.

Exposures: Study characteristics: sponsor trial phase, study type, and country.

Main Outcomes And Measures: Reporting of race, reporting of ethnicity, reporting of both.

Results: Among 58,163 studies (mean enrollment=1,215 participants), 44.8% did not report race or ethnicity to the repository (mean enrollment=1,481 participants). The proportion of studies reporting both race and ethnicity rose from 7.4% in 2013 to 54.6% in 2024. In multivariable models, observational studies had lower odds of reporting race and ethnicity (odds ratio[OR]=0.55, 95% confidence interval[CI]=0.49-0.61) compared with interventional trials. Phase 4 trials were least likely phase to report race and ethnicity (OR=0.32; CI=0.29-0.35), and studies with only National Institute of Health funding were more likely to report race and ethnicity compared to studies with any industry funding or sponsorship (OR=1.70, CI=1.61-1.79). For studies that reported race, White participants comprised ≥50% each year based on study-level percentages; proportions of Asian participants declined, and Black participants fluctuated. 'Not Hispanic or Latino' remained ≥80% of reported ethnicity annually.

Conclusions And Relevance: Race and ethnicity reporting on clinicaltrials.gov has improved markedly yet remains incomplete, with shortfalls in late-phase and observational studies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12330421PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.21.25331865DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

race ethnicity
36
reporting race
24
race
12
ethnicity reporting
12
observational studies
12
report race
12
studies
11
ethnicity
11
reporting
10
clinical studies
8

Similar Publications

Hispanic Authorship in Orthopaedics: A Bibliometric Analysis of Orthopaedic Literature in the United States.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev

September 2025

From the University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA (Arroyo, Moore); the Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL (Cruz); the Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI (Rodarte); Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Banner University Sp

Introduction: Orthopaedic surgery has historically been among the least ethnically diverse fields in medicine. The latest American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Census report in 2018 indicates that only 2.2% of all practicing orthopaedic surgeons in the United States identify as Hispanic/Latino.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Time to initiation of therapy in oncological care is an influential factor in disease progression and survival outcomes in many cancer types. We aim to identify factors associated with delayed time to treatment (TTT) in high-grade osteosarcoma and its relationship to disease-specific survival (DSS).

Methods: The SEER database was queried for biopsy-confirmed cases of high-grade osteosarcoma between 2000 and 2021 using ICD-O-3 histology codes 9180/3-9194/3 and primary site codes C40.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF