A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Analyzing Nursing Records in Wound Care Using a Large Language Model. | LitMetric

Analyzing Nursing Records in Wound Care Using a Large Language Model.

Stud Health Technol Inform

College of Nursing and Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.

Published: August 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

This study aimed to summarize unstructured nursing records on cancer wound management using a large language model (LLM) and assess the quality of these summaries. This retrospective descriptive study used 80 unstructured nursing records, which were generated from the documentation of specialized cancer wound care nurses. The analysis of the records consisted of four steps: 1) selecting 21 key variables based on British Columbia Cancer Agency guidelines, 2) using an LLM to summarize records according to these variables, 3) evaluating the quality of the summaries using both quantitative and qualitative assessment methods, and 4) categorizing errors in low-quality summaries. Of the 80 nursing records analyzed, the LLM achieved complete accuracy in summarizing nursing intervention variables for cancer wounds, while accurately summarizing approximately four-fifths of the nursing assessment variables. In both quantitative and qualitative evaluations of LLM-generated summaries, factual consistency demonstrated the highest quality scores. Approximately half of the low-quality summaries were reasoning errors. These findings highlight the potential of an LLM to support treatments for cancer wound patients by summarizing unstructured nursing records.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SHTI251223DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nursing records
20
unstructured nursing
12
cancer wound
12
wound care
8
large language
8
language model
8
quality summaries
8
quantitative qualitative
8
low-quality summaries
8
records
7

Similar Publications