Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Introduction: Robot-assisted technologies in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been introduced to increase implantation accuracy, minimize revisions, and ideally improve patient outcomes. However, concerns remain regarding increased costs and extended operating time. The aim of this study was to analyze the development of the cost structure of robot-assisted image-based knee arthroplasty in a specialized center over a 6-year period.

Methods: A retrospective cost analysis of image-based robot-assisted TKA based on data from 2024 was conducted and compared with results from a similar analysis from 2018. Specific parameters such as operating time, number and cost of surgical instrument trays, technology costs (leasing and service costs of the robot system), costs for robot-specific disposable materials, and preoperative CT imaging were considered. All costs were adjusted for inflation, converted to US dollars, and standardized to both a fixed case volume (n = 125 from 2018) and the actual case volume in 2024 (n = 457).

Results: The fixed costs for the robotic technology itself (leasing and service fees per year) showed a slight increase between 2018 and 2024 (USD 151,000 vs. USD 225,620). However, due to the significant volume expansion achieved during this period, case-related technology costs were reduced by 60% (USD 1210 to USD 490). In addition, the costs for disposable materials were reduced by 27% (USD 600 to USD 440), and costs for preoperative CT imaging were reduced by 29% (USD 420 to USD 300). The average operating time was significantly reduced between 2018 and 2024 (73 min to 54 min) and was ultimately 5 min shorter than the comparable time for the manual technique (59 min). Overall, the average case-related total costs were reduced by 50% (USD 2600 to USD 1320) within 6 years.

Conclusion: The total case-related costs of robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty have been reduced by 50% over the past years. This was achieved mainly due to increased case volume and resulting cost efficiencies, shortened operative time, and reductions in disposable material costs. The technology itself has not become cheaper over the years.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12396978PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00132-025-04696-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

knee arthroplasty
16
costs
12
operating time
12
case volume
12
usd
10
cost analysis
8
analysis 2018
8
technology costs
8
leasing service
8
disposable materials
8

Similar Publications

Background: A clear understanding of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) is essential for effectively implementing patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) as a performance measure for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Since not achieving MCID and SCB may reflect suboptimal surgical benefit, the primary aim of this study was to use machine learning to predict patients who may not achieve the threshold-based outcomes (i.e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Functional recovery after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) varies widely among individuals, and traditional assessments often fail to detect subtle changes in real-world walking ability. Wearable sensors offer continuous and objective tracking of gait outside of clinical settings. In this prospective, longitudinal study, thirty-one patients undergoing unilateral TKA wore thigh-mounted accelerometers continuously from 2 weeks before surgery through 90 days postoperatively.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Individuals who have had total joint arthroplasty (TJA) are subject to lifelong exposure to metal-based implants. The relationship between chronic exposure to metal-based implants and systemic effects on the brain remains unclear. We aimed to determine the association between TJA and the subsequent long-term risk of dementia.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Total knee and hip arthroplasty (TKA and THA) are among the most performed elective procedures. Rising demand and the resource-intensive nature of these procedures have contributed to longer wait times despite significant health care investment. Current scheduling methods often rely on average surgical durations, overlooking patient-specific variability.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF