Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Purpose: To assess facial soft tissue levels and buccal bone thickness following immediate implant placement in compromised maxillary anterior sockets using marginal preservation technique.
Materials And Methods: A total of 49 patients with failing maxillary anterior teeth were assigned to single immediate implant placement using appropriately sized implants, combined with absorbable collagen matrix membrane and sticky demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft grafting. Definitive crown placement occurred 6 months after provisionalization. The primary outcome was the change in soft tissue levels, assessed using pink esthetic score (PES). Additionally, survival rates and buccal bone thickness were evaluated.
Results: The implant survival rate at 6-month follow-up was 100%. After 6 months, the overall PES significantly increased from 6.16 ± 2.23 to 7.31 ± 0.87 ( = 0.002). There was no statistically significant difference in esthetic outcomes between thick and thin gingival phenotypes. Implants with immediate provisionalization had a higher PES compared to those with delayed provisionalization (7.53 ± 0.76 and 7.04 ± 0.93, respectively, = 0.041). A positive gain in buccal bone thickness was observed at 6-month post-surgery, and the timing of provisionalization (immediate versus delayed) did not significantly influence buccal bone thickness.
Conclusion: Immediate implant placement combined with a marginal preservation technique resulted in optimized esthetic outcome and positive changes in buccal bone thickness.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12316633 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12663-025-02468-6 | DOI Listing |