A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: Network is unreachable

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Marginal Bone Changes at Bone-Level Implants With Narrow or Standard Diameter Abutments: 1-Year Results of a Randomised Controlled Trial. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Aim: To evaluate changes in the peri-implant marginal bone level at implants restored with narrow or standard-diameter abutments after 12 months.

Material & Methods: Twenty-eight partially edentulous patients were randomly allocated to two groups. The test group consisted of 14 patients restored with a 2.9 mm diameter abutment (21 implants), while the control group included 14 patients restored with a 4.1 mm diameter abutment (17 implants). The primary outcome variable was the radiographic change in the peri-implant marginal bone level at 12 months, measured as the distance from the implant shoulder to the first bone-to-implant contact (fBIC). Secondary outcome variables included clinical peri-implant parameters, the papilla index, biological and mechanical complications, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and professional aesthetic assessment.

Results: A per-protocol analysis was conducted on the 22 patients who completed all scheduled follow-up visits. At the patient level, the change in mean radiographic bone level from definitive prosthesis placement to 12 months showed a reduction in the distance from the implant shoulder to the fBIC of 0.16 ± 0.31 mm in the test group and 0.21 ± 0.34 mm in the control group, with no statistically significant differences between the groups. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups for any of the secondary outcomes.

Conclusions: Considering the limitations of this study, no significant differences in peri-implant marginal bone levels were found between bone-level implants restored with narrow and standard diameter abutments after 12-month follow-up. Additionally, no differences were observed in clinical variables, patient-reported outcomes, or complications.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.70005DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

marginal bone
16
peri-implant marginal
12
bone level
12
bone-level implants
8
narrow standard
8
standard diameter
8
diameter abutments
8
implants restored
8
restored narrow
8
test group
8

Similar Publications