Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

The use of dentin grafts is relatively recent, and their efficacy remains a topic of debate. Various techniques and devices are available for dentin grafting; however, their application has been inconsistent, as each method yields a distinct product with unique biological properties and potential uses. One of the challenges that arises with the introduction of a new biomaterial is the potential confusion between different preparations. Specifically, generalization may significantly impact the understanding of unique qualities and/or potential limitations. The various materials that make up the family of tooth-derived graft materials share only one common starting point: the patient's extracted tooth. Beyond that, the processes of grinding, demineralization, and detoxification differ significantly, resulting in final materials with completely different percentages of minerals, bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), collagenic and noncollagenic proteins, and residual bacterial load. These differences influence the regenerative potential of one material compared to another, as well as the resorption rate. For instance, incomplete sterilization of the material can accelerate the resorption process, leading to insufficient regeneration. Here, we propose a classification of dentin grafts into four categories based on their processing methods. This classification aims to clarify the successes and challenges encountered to date, offering an objective framework to guide the ongoing development of these techniques. The aim of this study is to establish the first classification system of autogenous partial demineralized tooth-derived grafting biomaterials.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12310315PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/ijod/6646405DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tooth-derived grafting
8
dentin grafts
8
classification
4
classification autologous
4
autologous tooth-derived
4
materials
4
grafting materials
4
materials fundamental
4
fundamental concepts
4
concepts dentin
4

Similar Publications

The use of dentin grafts is relatively recent, and their efficacy remains a topic of debate. Various techniques and devices are available for dentin grafting; however, their application has been inconsistent, as each method yields a distinct product with unique biological properties and potential uses. One of the challenges that arises with the introduction of a new biomaterial is the potential confusion between different preparations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

: During alveolar cleft grafting, the use of autogenous cancellous bone harvested from the iliac crest is still considered the gold standard. Due to the risk of donor-site morbidity and excessive graft resorption, alternative grafting materials (e.g.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of autogenous tooth substitute graft (ATSG) prepared from autogenous third molars compared to xenograft in reducing osseous defects at the distal aspect of the second molars after impacted mandibular third molars removal.

Materials And Methods: A randomized, double-blind, split-mouth clinical trial was conducted with 14 patients (aged 20-30 years) with bilateral mesioangular or horizontal impacted mandibular third molars. Following extraction, one socket received autogenous tooth-derived graft material (experimental site) prepared using a dentine grinder while the contralateral socket received xenogenic bone substitute (control site).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A Histologic Study on the Use of Tooth as a Graft Material in Oral Surgery: Analysis of 187 Samples.

Materials (Basel)

May 2025

Department of Biomedical, Surgical, and Dental Science, Università degli Studi di Milano, Viale Pisa 10, 20146 Milan, Italy.

: To reconstruct and maintain hard tissues over time, it is necessary to follow effective protocols and use appropriate materials. The selection of the graft material and its properties can also affect the final outcomes. For this purpose, numerous graft materials have been suggested.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Increased interest in tooth-derived materials as a natural alternative to synthetic biomaterials for preserving alveolar ridge structure post-extraction has emerged, prompting a study comparing procedures in the maxilla and mandible using demineralized dentin treated with Tooth Transformer.
  • The study included 178 healthy patients with 187 socket sites and employed histological assessments to evaluate outcomes after preservation procedures, dividing samples into mandible (Group A) and maxilla (Group B) for a detailed analysis after 5 months.
  • Results showed effective healing and bone architecture maintenance, with Group A demonstrating higher bone volume and vital new bone formation compared to Group B, highlighting the differences in bone regeneration between the maxilla and mandible.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF