A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Absence of independent prognostic impact of node status in M1 prostate cancer: implications from a SEER-based study. | LitMetric

Absence of independent prognostic impact of node status in M1 prostate cancer: implications from a SEER-based study.

Int Urol Nephrol

Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.

Published: July 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the association between T stage, N stage, and Gleason score with OS in metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) patients.

Methods: Using the SEER database, we identified M1 prostate cancer patients. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with Log-rank testing was performed, stratified by metastatic substages (M1a, M1b, M1c). Multivariable Cox regression models identified independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS).

Results: A total of 170 mPCa patients were included, 60.0% had Gleason score ≥ 8, 74.7% presented with T3-T4 disease (versus 25.3% with localized T1-T2 tumors), and metastatic distribution included 68.8% M1b, 17.6% M1a, and 13.5% M1c. M1c patients demonstrated significantly worse prognosis (p = 0.033). Subgroup analyses revealed that advanced T stage significantly correlated with reduced OS in the overall M1 cohort (p = 0.015), M1b (p = 0.018), and M1c subgroups (p = 0.004), but not in M1a (p = 0.226). Nodal status showed no significant association with OS in any subgroup (M1a: p = 0.252; M1b: p = 0.762; M1c: p = 0.616). On multivariable Cox analysis, Gleason score ≥ 8 (HR = 2.65, 95%CI 1.21-5.79, p = 0.014), T4 stage (HR = 3.04, 95%CI 1.17-7.90, p = 0.023), and M1c substage (HR = 6.27, 95%CI 1.61-24.39, p = 0.008) emerged as independent predictors of poor survival.

Conclusion: Our study suggests that nodal staging may have limited biological rationale in PCa when synchronous distant metastases exist.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11255-025-04694-wDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prostate cancer
12
independent prognostic
8
multivariable cox
8
gleason score ≥ 8
8
m1c
6
absence independent
4
prognostic impact
4
impact node
4
node status
4
status prostate
4

Similar Publications