A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Utility of Virtual Program Information Sessions to Inform Medical Students About Radiation Oncology Residency Programs. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic led to widespread adoption of virtual program information sessions (VPIS) in Radiation Oncology (RO) to provide medical students (MS) with information about residency programs. We aimed to investigate whether students find VPIS useful and desire continuation. An anonymous survey utilizing 5-point Likert scales and descriptive feedback was developed to assess MS and residency program member (RPM) perspectives on VPIS. Surveys were distributed between September and December 2023 to MS who registered for RO VPIS during the 2022-2023 Canadian Resident Matching Service (CaRMS) cycle and RPMs who had attended VPIS. Quantitative data were interpreted with descriptive statistics. Eighteen MS (of 25 VPIS MS attendees) and 20 RPMs completed the survey. Overall, 100% of MS and RPMs agreed or strongly agreed that sessions were useful and should continue, though RPMs endorsed more strongly that sessions were useful (4.82 vs. 4.5, p = 0.045) and should continue (5.00 vs. 4.67, p = 0.008). MS reported sessions being cost-free and providing exposure to more programs as benefits (100% and 94% agree or strongly agree), as did RPMs (100% agree or strongly agree). Proposed improvements included having sessions for different time zones, increased resident interactions, and only having residents present. This is the first analysis of the utility of VPIS in RO and supports continuation. Responses suggest numerous benefits with limited detriments. We recommend integration of these results to optimize implementation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02689-wDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

virtual program
8
program sessions
8
medical students
8
radiation oncology
8
residency programs
8
agree agree
8
vpis
7
sessions
6
rpms
5
utility virtual
4

Similar Publications