Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
The Delta-Adjusted (DA) approach in multiple imputation (MI) is applied under several key assumptions in the Cox hazard model, where two time-dependent covariates have missing observations. Missingness in these covariates is assumed to be not missing at random (NMAR) and is modeled through delta adjustments, with different delta values specified to capture deviations from the missing at random (MAR) assumption. Within the MI framework, missing values are imputed under various plausible missingness scenarios while preserving the relationship between time-dependent covariates and the event-time outcome. Event-time dependence is accounted for by assuming that missingness in covariates is influenced by an individual's treatment response or disease progression, thereby capturing intra-individual variability. Compared to other sensitivity analysis techniques, DA under MI explicitly adjusts imputed values using delta shifts, providing a structured approach to handling NMAR data. Unlike traditional methods that rely on pattern-mixture or selection models without direct imputation, DA generates multiple datasets with controlled sensitivity adjustments, ensuring a better variability assessment. Additionally, DA allows flexible assumptions regarding loss to follow-up (FU) and event occurrence through delta values, whereas other methods often rely on fixed assumptions about missingness. Its results are more interpretable, providing sensitivity bounds for treatment effects under different missing data scenarios.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12289879 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-09599-3 | DOI Listing |