A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Long-term outcome of grade 1 rectal neuroendocrine tumor ≤1 cm after incomplete endoscopic resection. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background/aims: Surveillance strategies for small grade 1 rectal neuroendocrine tumors (G1 rNETs) after incomplete endoscopic resection (ER) remain controversial. We evaluated the long-term outcomes of patients with G1 rNET ≤1 cm after ER who did and did not undergo complete resection.

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 441 patients with G1 rNETs measuring ≤1 cm after ER between 2011 and 2022. Patients were divided into complete and incomplete resection groups according to histopathological evaluation. Logistic regression analysis identified the risk factors for incomplete resection after ER.

Results: The mean follow-up intervals were 38.6 and 45.7 months in all patients and the incomplete resection group, respectively. No recurrences were observed during the follow-up period. The mean lesion size was 5.5 mm and the complete resection rate was 80.5% (n=355). In the logistic regression analysis, lesion size 5.1 to 10 mm (odds ratio [OR], 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.245-4.203; p=0.008), multiple lesions (OR, 8.3; 95% CI, 1.247-54.774; p=0.029), and retroflexion view during the procedure (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.668-9.615; p=0.002) were independent risk factors for incomplete resection.

Conclusions: The prognosis of G1 rNET ≤1 cm after ER was very good, regardless of the histopathological results.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2025.043DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

incomplete resection
12
grade rectal
8
rectal neuroendocrine
8
incomplete endoscopic
8
endoscopic resection
8
rnet ≤1
8
logistic regression
8
regression analysis
8
risk factors
8
factors incomplete
8

Similar Publications