The safety and accuracy of radiation-free spinal navigation using a short, scoliosis-specific BoneMRI-protocol, compared to CT.

Purpose: Spinal navigation systems require pre- and/or intra-operative 3-D imaging, which expose young patients to harmful radiation. We assessed a scoliosis-specific MRI-protocol that provides T2-weighted MRI and AI-generated synthetic-CT (sCT) scans, through deep learning algorithms. This study aims to compare MRI-based synthetic-CT spinal navigation to CT for safety and accuracy of pedicle screw planning and placement at thoracic and lumbar levels.

Methods: Spines of 5 cadavers were scanned with thin-slice CT and the scoliosis-specific MRI-protocol (to create sCT). Preoperatively, on both CT and sCT screw trajectories were planned. Subsequently, four spine surgeons performed surface-matched, navigated placement of 2.5 mm k-wires in all pedicles from T3 to L5. Randomization for CT/sCT, surgeon and side was performed (1:1 ratio). On postoperative CT-scans, virtual screws were simulated over k-wires. Maximum angulation, distance between planned and postoperative screw positions and medial breach rate (Gertzbein-Robbins classification) were assessed.

Results: 140 k-wires were inserted, 3 were excluded. There were no pedicle breaches > 2 mm. Of sCT-guided screws, 59 were grade A and 10 grade B. For the CT-guided screws, 47 were grade A and 21 grade B (p = 0.022). Average distance (± SD) between intraoperative and postoperative screw positions was 2.3 ± 1.5 mm in sCT-guided screws, and 2.4 ± 1.8 mm for CT (p = 0.78), average maximum angulation (± SD) was 3.8 ± 2.5° for sCT and 3.9 ± 2.9° for CT (p = 0.75).

Conclusion: MRI-based, AI-generated synthetic-CT spinal navigation allows for safe and accurate planning and placement of thoracic and lumbar pedicle screws in a cadaveric model, without significant differences in distance and angulation between planned and postoperative screw positions compared to CT.