A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Evaluation of Sentinel-Free Soiled Bedding as a Replacement for Direct Sampling in PCR Detection of Rodent Pathogens during Quarantine. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Establishing a screening method for rodent pathogens is an integral component of an institution's rodent health surveillance program. Most rodent quarantine programs use direct colony sampling (DCS) from live animals for pathogen PCR testing. DCS may elicit undue stress to the animal and be time consuming, contingent on the number of quarantined animals. Sentinel-free soiled bedding (SFSB) sampling has previously been used to monitor the pathogen status of research rodents. A pilot study was conducted to determine the feasibility of an SFSB-based quarantine by comparing it to DCS for the evaluation of pet shop mice of different age ranges. Enhanced detection by SFSB for the 6- to 10-wk age range supported further investigation. The subsequent main study evaluated whether SFSB sampling is as effective as traditional DCS for detecting rodent pathogens. We hypothesized that SFSB contact media sampling is either equivalent to or more effective than DCS for detecting pathogens in quarantined mice. The study included mice imported from various institutions between October 2023 and August 2024. The DCS and exposed contact media were tested using PCR analyses. The total number of positive agent assay detections by DCS was 157, compared with 173 with the SFSB method. These results suggest that contact media sampling provides equivalent or superior detection of rodent pathogens compared with the DCS method. Although not statistically significant, it was observed that delaying sample submission decreased detection rates for 2 RNA viruses: 80% for murine astrovirus-1 (MuAstV1; 4 out of 5 samples) and 67% for genogroup V norovirus (MNV; 4 out of 6 samples). Immediate submission restored the detection rate to 100% for MuAstV1 and 91% for MNV. To conclude, SFSB rapid submission during quarantine provides a reliable and effective alternative to the traditional DCS method for the detection of rodent pathogens. This nonintrusive methodology mitigates stress during sampling while enhancing the effectiveness and sensitivity of pathogen detection.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-25-028DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rodent pathogens
20
detection rodent
12
contact media
12
dcs
9
sentinel-free soiled
8
soiled bedding
8
sfsb sampling
8
traditional dcs
8
dcs detecting
8
media sampling
8

Similar Publications