98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: To describe national trends, predictors, insurance, and patient costs associated with sedation use during prostate biopsies.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Merative Marketscan Database from 2016 to 2021. Men undergoing prostate biopsy were identified using CPT codes. Biopsy type, anesthesia claims, comorbidities, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) use were determined through current procedural terminology/International Classification of Diseases 10th revision codes. Multivariable logistic regression assessed predictors of sedation use. Out-of-pocket costs were calculated by summing insurance copays, deductibles, and coinsurance, adjusted to 2021 dollars.
Results: The final cohort included 172,148 prostate biopsies. The mean patient age was 62 ± 8 years. The proportion of biopsies performed with sedation increased from 15.6% in 2016 to 25.5% in 2021. Saturation biopsies were 9 times more likely to involve sedation than systematic biopsies (OR = 9.02, 98% CI = 8.18-9.95, P <.001). Patients with a prior biopsy were 39% more likely to receive sedation (OR = 1.39, 98% CI = 1.35-1.43, P <.001). MRI-guided biopsies were nearly twice as likely to involve sedation compared to non-MRI biopsies (OR = 1.98, 98% CI = 1.93-2.04, P <.001). In 2021, the expected out-of-pocket cost for sedated biopsies was $663 USD (98% CI = $644-$682), compared to $489 USD (98% CI = $479-$498) for non-sedated procedures.
Conclusion: Sedation use during prostate biopsies is steadily increasing, alongside associated patient costs. Patients undergoing saturation biopsies and MRI-guided procedures, and those with prior biopsy history, were more likely to receive sedation. These findings highlight evolving patterns in biopsy practices and underscore the need to balance patient comfort with procedural cost and accessibility considerations.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2025.07.022 | DOI Listing |
Urology
August 2025
Mount Sinai Medical Center, Columbia University Division of Urology, Miami Beach, FL. Electronic address:
Medicine (Baltimore)
August 2025
Department of Anesthesiology, The First People's Hospital of Wenling, Weling, Zhejiang Province, China.
This retrospective cohort study evaluates the impact of dexmedetomidine hydrochloride on hemodynamics, postoperative analgesia, and the incidence of complications in radical prostatectomy (RP). A total of 120 patients who underwent RP between January 2019 and December 2023 were included. The patients were divided into the experimental group (receiving dexmedetomidine-assisted sedation) and the control group (receiving conventional general anesthesia induction).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFZhonghua Nan Ke Xue
October 2024
Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213003, China.
Objective: To compare the clinical effects of different combinations of anesthetics in transperineal prostate biopsy in elderly male patients.
Methods: We randomly divided 132 ≥65-year-old male patients to receive transperineal prostate biopsy under combined intravenous anesthesia with propofol + sufentanil (the PS group), remimazolam + sufentanil (the RS group), propofol + alfentanil (the PA group), or remimazolam + alfentanil (the RA group). We recorded the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) of the patients, the required rescue sedation, the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) scores upon admission into the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) after surgery, the length of stay in the PACU and the incidence of adverse reactions, followed by comparison of the data obtained among the four groups.
Urology
July 2025
Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH; Department of Urology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY. Electronic address:
Objective: To describe national trends, predictors, insurance, and patient costs associated with sedation use during prostate biopsies.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Merative Marketscan Database from 2016 to 2021. Men undergoing prostate biopsy were identified using CPT codes.
World J Urol
July 2025
Sorbonne Université, Service d'Urologie, AP-HP, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, 75020, France.
Purpose: To investigate the use of local anesthesia in the UroLift procedure for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), focusing on anesthetic modality, pain management, patient comfort, and the feasibility of performing the procedure in outpatient or office-based settings without general or spinal anesthesia.
Materials And Methods: A systematic review was conducted across PubMed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases up to November 2024. Studies were included if they involved BPH patients undergoing UroLift with local anesthesia, including techniques such as prostatic nerve blocks, transurethral intraprostatic anesthesia, and anesthetic gel.