Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Unipolar voltage mapping has shown value in delineating comprehensive atrial substrates. However, the clinical application of unipolar low-voltage areas (Uni-LVAs) in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is limited, largely because of the absence of a well established voltage threshold. In this study we aimed to: (1) define the threshold for Uni-LVA in the left atrium (LA); and (2) investigate the association between Uni-LVA burden and ablation outcomes in a prospective AF cohort.
Methods: The Uni-LVA threshold was defined as the average of the 6 cutoff values, representing the voltage at 95% of all electrograms from a reference cohort who underwent left-sided accessory pathway ablation and concomitant LA mapping. In a single-centre, prospective AF ablation cohort, LA mapping was conducted and the Uni-LVA burden was automatically calculated.
Results: Uni-LVA was defined as an area with an amplitude of < 1.6 mV. In 145 patients, the Uni-LVA burden was automatically obtained using customized software. During a follow-up period of 16 ± 4 months, 44 patients experienced recurrence. Uni-LVA burden was significantly associated with recurrence rates. Compared with group 1 (< 1%), the recurrence rates for group 2 (1%-10%) and group 3 (> 10%) were significantly higher (hazard ratio, 5.08 [P<0.001] and hazard ratio, 24.07 [P < 0.001]). Receiver operator curve analysis showed significantly higher predictive efficiency for Uni-LVA burden (area under the curve, 0.880 vs 0.762; P < 0.001) compared with the bipolar low voltage burden.
Conclusions: Using a unipolar voltage threshold of < 1.6 mV, Uni-LVA burden was independently associated with long-term AF recurrence after ablation and outperformed bipolar assessment. This finding suggests Uni-LVA could serve as a valuable tool for prognostic evaluation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2025.06.077 | DOI Listing |