A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Evaluating interprofessional primary care teams in high-income countries: A scoping review protocol on the conceptualization and measurement of team functioning, effectiveness, performance and collaboration in primary care. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Introduction: The delivery of primary care (PC) services by interprofessional teams serves as the cornerstone for building high-performing PC systems. Interprofessional team-based care is a collaborative approach to primary care delivery where healthcare professionals from multiple disciplines work together to provide comprehensive and coordinated care. Despite this recognition, the assessment of the impact of interprofessional PC teams is limited or mixed. There is a lack of clarity on how to define and measure team functioning, collaboration, performance, and effectiveness in PC, posing challenges for the evaluation of interprofessional PC teams. This review aims to dissect and analyze the definitions (conceptualizations and operationalization), measures, and measurement methodologies employed in defining and evaluating team functioning, collaboration, performance, and team effectiveness in PC. In the context of interprofessional PC teams, this review will answer the following questions: 1) How are the terms team functioning, performance, effectiveness, and collaboration conceptualized? 2) What are measures of team functioning, performance, effectiveness, and collaboration? 3) What instruments are used to evaluate team functioning, performance, effectiveness, and collaboration?.

Methods: A systematic approach will be undertaken to conduct this review. A comprehensive search across various academic databases, including PubMed, Medline, CINHAL, Scopus, and Web of Science, will be conducted. Keywords such as "team functioning," "performance measurement," "team effectiveness," "team collaboration," "primary care," and "primary healthcare" will be utilized to ensure the inclusion of relevant studies. Inclusion criteria will be established to filter studies focusing explicitly on interprofessional teams. The review will encompass both qualitative and quantitative studies, ensuring a holistic understanding of the subject matter. By synthesizing this information, the review aims to present an encompassing overview of the conceptualization, measurement and instruments employed to evaluate team functioning, performance, effectiveness, and collaboration within PC settings.

Discussion: Globally, governments are investing in the implementation of interprofessional PC teams. The lack of clear definitions and measurement of team outcomes underscores the importance of conducting a comprehensive review. This review will aim to address this gap in knowledge and help inform practice and policy, ultimately contributing to optimizing team functioning, performance, effectiveness, and collaboration within PC settings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12273952PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0328708PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

team functioning
32
interprofessional teams
24
performance effectiveness
24
functioning performance
20
primary care
16
teams review
12
review will
12
effectiveness collaboration
12
team
10
review
8

Similar Publications