Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background And Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the vasoactive inotropic score (VIS) in patients with fulminant myocarditis according to the application of venoarterial-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO).
Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 417 patients with biopsy-proven or clinically suspected fulminant myocarditis from 7 hospitals in Korea. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, heart transplantation, or the use of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) at 1 year.
Results: The median VIS was 19.9, and 217 (52.0%) patients received VA-ECMO. The primary outcome occurred in 105 patients (26.7%). All-cause death, heart transplantation, and the implantation of LVAD occurred in 81 (20.7%), 30 (8.7%), and 1 (0.3%) patients, respectively. VIS was associated with the risk of the primary outcome in both patients treated with VA-ECMO (hazard ratio [HR], 1.017 for every 10-point increase; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.007-1.028; p=0.001) and patients without VA-ECMO (HR, 1.128 for every 10-point increase; 95% CI, 1.079-1.179; p<0.001), but the effect was greater in patients without who did not receive VA-ECMO (interaction p<0.001). Furthermore, the predictive performance of VIS for the primary outcome was significantly lower in patients with VA-ECMO than in those without VA-ECMO (C-index, 0.555 vs. 0.780; p value for C-index comparison, 0.002).
Conclusions: In patients with fulminant myocarditis, the prognostic value of VIS was more prominent in patients without VA-ECMO than in patients with VA-ECMO. These findings suggest that the prognostic value of VIS is weakened under the influence of VA-ECMO.
Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05933902.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2024.0445 | DOI Listing |