Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: The relationships between subsidence and cage dimension and surface area in multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) remain unclear in the current literature. This study aimed to analyze the risk factors influencing cage subsidence following multilevel ACDFs, and the relationship between cage subsidence and cage dimensions, surface area, patient-reported outcomes, and fusion rates.

Methods: Patients who had undergone primary multilevel ACDFs with a minimum follow-up duration of 1 year were enrolled in this study. Cage subsidence was evaluated using lateral radiographs and defined as a decrease in disc height ≥3 mm. The patients were classified into the cage subsidence and no cage subsidence groups. Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores were recorded at baseline and every clinic visit. Fusion rates were evaluated at the final follow-up.

Results: Eighty-five patients (mean age, 58.6 years; mean follow-up, 12.7 months) were included. The cage subsidence rates were 5%, 12%, 23%, and 31% at the 6-week, 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year follow-up, respectively. The demographic, perioperative, and radiographic parameters were not different between the two groups. Cage type, width, depth, and surface area did not influence the subsidence rates. Cage height was positively correlated with the depth of cage subsidence ( < 0.001,  = 0.263). A cage height ≥8 mm was associated with a higher risk of cage subsidence (odds ratio: 3.9, 95% confidence interval: 1.8–8.5,  < 0.001). An SPA ≥ 4° of the distal screw was identified as a risk factor for cage subsidence at the distal level. The overall fusion rate was 88.5% in both groups. NDI scores did not differ preoperatively or at follow-up.

Conclusions: Cage height and cage subsidence were significantly correlated in ACDF patients. A cage height ≥8 mm may be a risk factor for cage subsidence. A cage with a larger surface area may not provide protection against subsidence.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12232055PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08863-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cage subsidence
28
surface area
16
cage
12
subsidence cage
12
subsidence
10
cage height
8
subsidence multilevel
8
multilevel anterior
8
anterior cervical
8
cervical discectomy
8

Similar Publications

Background: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) is widely adopted for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. Expandable cages are now increasingly used in MIS-TLIF to facilitate disc height restoration in narrow spaces. Despite theoretical advantages, the clinical and radiologic outcomes of expandable cage compared to static cage remain controversial.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the predictive efficacy of quantitative CT (QCT)-based endplate volumetric bone mineral density (EP-vBMD) and MRI-based endplate vertebral bone quality (EBQ) score for cage subsidence (CS) after lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF).

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent single-level LLIF in conjunction with pedicle screw fixation at the authors' institution between January 2019 and April 2023. The volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) was measured based on preoperative CT using phantom-less QCT software.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Study Design: Cross-sectional study.

Objective: This study aimed to analyze the failure patterns of expandable corpectomy cages.

Summary Of Background Data: Expandable corpectomy cages offer significant advantages for anterior column reconstruction but introduce unique mechanical complexities.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To explore the effect of nano-hydroxyapatite/collagen composite (nHAC) on bone graft fusion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in patients with cervical spondylosis and low bone mass.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 47 patients with low bone mass who underwent ACDF from 2017 to 2021. They were divided into the nHAC group and the allogeneic bone group according to different bone graft materials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcome of treatment of degenerative lumbosacral stenosis in dogs with a stand-alone intervertebral spacer (S group) and combined with a pedicle screw and rod fixation (S + PSRF group) in the lumbosacral junction.Retrospective study. Medical records (2014-2023) were reviewed for dogs treated with a stand-alone intervertebral spacer (S group) or a spacer combined with PSRF (S + PSRF group).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF