Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
The impact of embodiment on numerical cognition remains under debate, with varying interpretations of its role in numerical processing. To clarify the overall effect size of embodied numerosity and its influencing factors, this study conducted a meta-analysis of 73 effect sizes from 49 papers using a random effects model. The main effect revealed a medium-strength effect size of embodied cognition on number processing, g = 0.660, 95 % CI [0.541, 0.779], p < 0.001. Subgroup analyses indicated that both the finger and non-finger groups had medium-strength effect sizes. Moderator effects analyses showed that the embodied numerosity effect was moderated by experimental task, gender, and handedness, while explicit instructions and the online state of sensorimotor activation were more likely to activate the embodied numerosity effect. This study provides a basis for understanding the relationship between embodiment and numerical cognition.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105180 | DOI Listing |