98%
921
2 minutes
20
Introduction: Although opioids are commonly used to relieve pain associated with surgery, they are not consequence free. Moreover, the USA and many western countries are currently experiencing a significant health crisis because of opioid addiction and its related overdose potential. There have been no studies that have evaluated patient preference regarding opioid use and its potential impact on the quality of recovery. The aim of this study is to compare the effect of patient preference on intraoperative opioid use on early postoperative quality of recovery after moderate risk laparoscopic/robotic abdominal surgery.
Methods: This trial is an interventional, pragmatic, partially randomised factorial trial. Adults (=240) scheduled for moderate-risk abdominal surgery under laparoscopic/robotic assistance (colorectal, urologic, and gynaecologic) will be allocated into four groups, according to their preference (choice of opioid-free opioid-based anaesthesia no choice and, if no choice, then the patient is randomised to opioid-based opioid-free anaesthesia). Anaesthesia providers and patients who choose their anaesthesia type will be unblinded of the allocation group. The primary endpoint will be the Quality of Recovery-15 score at postoperative day 1. Secondary endpoints will include patient satisfaction, postoperative nausea and vomiting, intraoperative bradycardia, postoperative opioid consumption, postoperative hypoxemia, and health-related quality of life using the EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L).
Conclusions: This trial will provide evidence on whether patient preference on intraoperative opioid use can improve patient quality of recovery after moderate-risk abdominal surgery.
Clinical Trial Registration: NCT06855641.
Protocol Version Number And Date: 2.0, 24 February 2025.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12219004 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100420 | DOI Listing |
Patient
September 2025
PPD Evidera Patient-Centered Research, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA.
Background: Migraine care is often suboptimal owing to undertreatment, variation in clinical outcomes and administration methods among existing treatments, and between- and within-individual heterogeneity in the clinical course of migraine. In response to these challenges, preference studies have been increasingly conducted to inform treatment decision-making and development. However, gaps remain in understanding how treatment preferences have been assessed across different migraine studies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSupport Care Cancer
September 2025
Department of Therapeutic Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Purpose: To clarify the preferred timing and contents of early palliative care and preference for continued care delivery among patients with advanced cancer in Japan.
Methods: We conducted an Internet-based anonymous questionnaire survey on adult patients with advanced cancer. We assessed the patients' wishes for palliative care delivered by a team or at outpatient clinics while asymptomatic, as well as the preferred intervention timing and preference for continuing care lifelong.
J Cosmet Dermatol
September 2025
Department of Medicine, Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran.
Background: Melasma is a prevalent skin condition that primarily affects females of reproductive age. Despite the various available treatments, managing melasma is challenging due to frequent relapses and partial responses. Tranexamic acid (TXA) has gained attention as a potential treatment because of its antifibrinolytic and anti-melanogenic properties.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Korean Med Sci
September 2025
Department of Preventive Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Background: Clinics and hospitals in South Korea are often perceived as competitors to each other. This study examines the overlapping roles in providing primary care provision between clinics and hospitals by analyzing the healthcare facility type where patients first receive diagnoses of hypertension (HTN) or diabetes mellitus (DM). We also explore the characteristics of patients that influence their choice of healthcare facility and compare healthcare utilization patterns in the first year post-diagnosis by facility type.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Pregnancy Childbirth
September 2025
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Medicinaregatan 3, Gothenburg, SE- 413 45, Sweden.
Background: A growing body of knowledge is questioning the timing of postpartum care (PPC) and suggesting a structural change. The primary aim was to evaluate individuals' satisfaction with additional PPC, and the secondary aim was to identify different needs postpartum.
Methods: This comparative study was conducted in six maternity clinics in Gothenburg, Sweden 2019-2020.