A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Random forest with preoperative core biopsy categories: a novel method for refining ultrasonic Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System evaluation. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Many benign breast lesions are classified as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4, resulting in unneeded biopsies. We thus aimed to build a model based on a core needle biopsy category (CBC) to improve upon BI-RADS classification by analyzing clinical and ultrasonic features.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in which female patients with solid breast tumors who underwent ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) were enrolled. Participants were randomly allocated to either a training or validation cohort at a 7:3 ratio. We developed CBC prediction models using five machine learning algorithms: support vector machine, random forest (RF), multilayer perceptron (MLP), logistic regression (LR), and k-nearest neighbors (KNNs). The optimal model was selected based on the highest area under the curve (AUC) value and subsequently applied to adjust the BI-RADS categories. The category of BI-RADS was downgraded by one if the CBC prediction was B1 or B2 or upgraded by one if the CBC prediction was B3 or B5. The number and rate of missed or accurate up- or downgrading were calculated.

Results: A total of 1,082 female patients were included comprising 1,185 lesions. The optimal model was RF [AUC =0.943, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.930-0.956]. In 42 BI-RADS category 3 lesions, 4 (9.5%) cases were upgraded, 3 of which were correct, while 38 (90.5%) cases were downgraded, 37 of which were correct. In 167 BI-RADS category 4A lesions, 149 (89.2%) cases were downgraded, 145 of which were correct, while 18 cases (10.8%) were upgraded, 13 of which were correct.

Conclusions: The predictive model of CBC built by RF can aid in adjusting BI-RADS category 3 and 4A and thus help prevent unnecessary biopsy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12209627PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-24-2070DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bi-rads category
16
cbc prediction
12
random forest
8
breast imaging
8
imaging reporting
8
reporting data
8
data system
8
core needle
8
needle biopsy
8
female patients
8

Similar Publications