Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
This study evaluates the performance of ChatGPT-4, a Large Language Model (LLM), in automatically extracting U scores from free-text thyroid ultrasound reports collected from University Hospitals Birmingham (UHB), UK, between 2014 and 2024. The LLM was provided with guidelines on the U classification system and extracted U scores independently from 14,248 de-identified reports, without access to human-assigned scores. The LLM-extracted scores were compared to initial clinician-assigned and refined U scores provided by expert reviewers. The LLM achieved 97.7% agreement with refined human U scores, successfully identifying the highest U score in 98.1% of reports with multiple nodules. Most discrepancies (2.5%) were linked to ambiguous descriptions, multi-nodule reports, and cases with human-documented uncertainty. While the results demonstrate the potential for LLMs to improve reporting consistency and reduce manual workload, ethical and governance challenges such as transparency, privacy, and bias must be addressed before routine clinical deployment. Embedding LLMs into reporting workflows, such as Online Analytical Processing (OLAP) tools, could further enhance reporting quality and consistency.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SHTI250672 | DOI Listing |