A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Effect of lidocaine ice button topical anesthesia on pain during maxillary buccal infiltration in 6-10-year children - A randomized control trial. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Context: Effective pain management in children during local anesthetic administration would be a key to a successful and painless dental procedure. Precooling (PC) has emerged as pain control tool in dentistry.

Aims: This study aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy of lidocaine Ice button and lidocaine gel as topical anesthesia during maxillary buccal infiltration in children.

Settings And Design: Randomized crossover trial, department of pediatric and preventive dentistry.

Subjects And Methods: Thirty children [60 local anesthesia (LA) injections] aged 6-10 years requiring bilateral maxillary buccal infiltration for dental procedure, divided into 2 groups with equal distribution for this split-mouth study. The study group was lidocaine ice button topical anesthesia; the control group was the lidocaine gel group. Subjective pain was evaluated using Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale, objective pain evaluation was done using Sound Eye and Motor (SEM) scale. Anxiety assessment using Venham picture test (VPT) and physiologic parameters such as SpO2 and Heart rate were evaluated before, during, and after administration of LA. Acceptance of lidocaine ice button was evaluated using a customized validated questionnaire.

Statistical Analysis Used: Data recorded in Microsoft Excel 365 and subjected to statistical analysis using Statistical Product and service solution SPSS version 21.0 with P value considered statistically significant at < 0.05.

Results: A significant reduction in pain on injection for both objective and subjective evaluations in the Lidocaine Ice Button group, as topical anesthesia was seen (P < 0.00011) Majority of the children preferred the use of Lidocaine ice button as a topical anesthetic. No difference in pain was observed in groups based on treatment sequence.

Conclusions: Less pain on injection was observed, proving the efficacy of lidocaine ice button as topical anesthesia for maxillary infiltration in the study. Lidocaine ice button was well accepted by the children as topical anesthesia.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_119_25DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lidocaine ice
32
ice button
32
topical anesthesia
24
button topical
16
maxillary buccal
12
buccal infiltration
12
lidocaine
10
pain
9
button
8
dental procedure
8

Similar Publications