Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Concomitant use of oral anticoagulants (OACs) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is common despite concerns about increased bleeding risk. We sought to assess the frequency of co-administering NSAIDs for patients on OAC and the impact on clinical outcomes.

Methods: We conducted a multicenter registry-based cohort study, utilizing 4:1 propensity score matching to compare patients on OAC monotherapy to those on OAC+NSAIDs therapy between 2011 and 2023 at six anticoagulation clinics of the Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative. Adults on OAC for venous thromboembolism and/or atrial fibrillation were included. Patients with a history of heart valve replacement, under 3 months of follow-up, or using two or more antiplatelet drugs were excluded. The primary outcome was any bleeding. Secondary outcomes included bleeding subtypes, thrombosis/thromboembolism, healthcare utilization, and mortality.

Results: Among the 12,083 patients receiving OAC, 449 (3.7%) were concurrently prescribed NSAIDs. The 1,796 patients on OAC monotherapy were compared to 449 patients on OAC+NSAID therapy after propensity matching. The matched groups were well balanced and followed for an average of 30 months. No significant differences were observed in bleeding event rates per 100 patient-years between the two groups, including overall (25.1 vs. 24.3, p= 0.56), major, and non-major bleeding. Rates of thrombosis, emergency room visits, hospitalizations, transfusion, and mortality were also similar.

Conclusion: Clinical outcomes were similar between OAC monotherapy and OAC with concomitant NSAIDs use in this real-world observational study. As there are limited treatment options for pain, further prospective research should be conducted to replicate these findings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.06.034DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients oac
12
oac monotherapy
12
cohort study
8
oac
7
patients
6
bleeding
5
outcomes oral
4
oral anticoagulation
4
anticoagulation concomitant
4
concomitant nsaid
4

Similar Publications

Importance: Patients with kidney failure (KF) receiving long-term dialysis have increased incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF). Patients with KF and AF have increased risk of stroke, death, and bleeding compared with age-matched cohorts. In KF, the use of oral anticoagulants (OACs) increases hemorrhage risk, offsetting potential benefits and making left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) a potentially promising solution for risk reduction in AF.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used among these patients to prevent upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) in anticoagulated patients. However, their clinical benefits among patients receiving OACs with a history of UGIB remain inconclusive. This study aimed to summarize the clinical benefits of PPIs for the secondary prevention of recurrent UGIB among patients using OACs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of mortality in cancer patients, and a substantial number of patients are being treated with oral anticoagulants. We aim to assess the comparative effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared to warfarin for VTE treatment in cancer patients.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we included 2,367 cancer patients who are new users of oral anticoagulants (OACs) for VTE treatment from 2009 to 2021 in NHS Scotland.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) with end-stage renal failure on renal replacement therapy are at high risk of stroke and bleeding, but the optimal oral anticoagulation (OAC) strategy is uncertain. To investigate the most effective OAC therapy for patients with AF on long-term dialysis.

Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases were systematically searched from inception to 9 October 2024 to identify relevant studies on OAC strategy for patients with AF on long-term dialysis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) use increases the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and CHADS-VASc ≥2. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is an alternative to OAC, however data about its use in patients with prior ICH is scarce and the timing of its performance is controversial. Furthermore, the long-term outcomes in this group of patients have not been described previously.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF