A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Comparison of subjective cyclovertical deviation and objective ocular torsion in sagging eye syndrome and superior oblique palsy. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

: To compare the differentiating clinical features of subjective cyclovertical deviation and objective ocular torsion in elderly patients with cyclovertical sagging eye syndrome (CSES) versus superior oblique palsy (SOP). : Prospectivestudy. : Patients with CSES ( = 22) and unilateral SOP ( = 20) aged ≥50 years were included. Subjective cyclovertical deviation was measured in the primary, secondary, and third-gaze positions using a synoptophore. The disc-fovea angle (DFA), which evaluates objective ocular torsion, was measured using fundus photographs. : The subjective vertical deviation of the primary position was 1.3° (median) in the CSES group and 4.3° in the SOP group ( < .001). Vertical deviation was larger in the SOP than CSES group in all gaze positions ( < .05). The subjective cyclodeviation of the primary gaze was -6.0° (-: excyclo) in the CSES and SOP groups( = .48). Cyclodeviation was larger in the SOP group in downgaze positions ( < .05). The mean DFAs were -11.5° in CSES group and -11.8° in SOP group for the hypertrophic eye ( = .85), and -12.2° in CSES group and -16.3° in SOP group for the hypotropic eye ( < .01). The ratio of patients with a larger DFA in the hypertropic than hypotropic eye was 9/22 (41.0%) in the CSES group and 4/20 (20%) in the SOP group. : SOP has a larger hypertropia than SES. Excyclotorsion does not help distinguish in primary position but if it is somewhat larger in downgaze more likely SOP. DFA showed no obvious clinical differences; it is difficult to distinguish the two diseases from DFA.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09273972.2025.2514123DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

subjective cyclovertical
12
cyclovertical deviation
12
objective ocular
12
ocular torsion
12
deviation objective
8
sagging eye
8
eye syndrome
8
superior oblique
8
oblique palsy
8
comparison subjective
4

Similar Publications