Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Sarilumab is approved for adult patients with polymyalgia rheumatica who have had an inadequate response to corticosteroids or who cannot tolerate corticosteroid taper. We aimed to evaluate the effect of sarilumab on patient-reported outcomes.

Methods: This phase 3, double-blind, randomised controlled trial was done in 60 centres in 17 countries. Eligible patients were adults aged 50 years or older who had at least one episode of disease flare during a glucocorticoid taper (at a dose of ≥7·5 mg per day or prednisone dose equivalent) within 12 weeks before screening and had a history of at least 8 weeks of glucocorticoid treatment (≥10 mg per day or prednisone dose equivalent). All the patients had symptoms of polymyalgia rheumatica and an erythrocyte sedimentation rate >30 mm/h or a C-reactive protein concentration of at least 10 mg/L within 12 weeks before screening. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either subcutaneous sarilumab 200 mg once every 2 weeks with a 14-week glucocorticoid taper or matching placebo with a 52-week glucocorticoid taper. Patients and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. The patient-reported outcomes measured were Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Patient Global Assessment of Health Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Pain VAS, Short Form Health Survey (SF-36 v2), EuroQoL 5-Dimensions 3-Levels (EQ-5D including the descriptive system and the VAS), and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F). Patient-reported outcomes were analysed until week 52 as changes from baseline. Post-hoc analyses included proportions of patients reporting improvements of at least minimum clinically important difference and scores of at least normative values. p values were nominal. Analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. There was no involvement of people with lived experience at any stage of the study. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03600818.

Findings: Between Oct 9, 2018, and July 15, 2020, 118 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive sarilumab (n=60) or placebo (n=58). Of these, 117 patients received treatment (59 in the sarilumab group and 58 in the placebo group). One patient assigned to the sarilumab group did not receive treatment. Mean age was 68·9 years (SD 8·1). 82 (69%) of 118 patients were female and 36 (31%) were male, and 98 (83%) were White. At baseline, moderate-to-severe fatigue was reported by 43 (73%) of 59 patients in the sarilumab group and 43 (74%) of 58 patients in the placebo group. At week 52, patients in the sarilumab group reported greater improvements than patients in the placebo group in SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS; least-squares mean [LSM] change 7·65 vs 2·87, p=0·020) and Mental Component Summary (MCS; 3·04 vs -1·71, p=0·030) scores, and in five of eight domains. Sarilumab showed greater improvements in EQ-5D utility index (0·11 vs -0·02, p=0·034) and VAS scores (8·37 vs -0·46, p=0·084), FACIT-F (7·91 vs 4·17, p=0·060), HAQ-DI (-0·39 vs -0·15, p=0·054), Pain VAS (-20·57 vs -12·04, p=0·20), and Patient Global Assessment VAS (-15·01 vs -6·08, p=0·13). More patients in the sarilumab group than in the placebo group reported improvements of minimum clinically important difference or greater in SF-36 PCS scores (odds ratio 3·46 [95% CI 1·16-10·62], p=0·020). More than 50% of patients in the sarilumab group reported scores of at least normative values for SF-36 MCS and four domain scores, whereas this was not the case for any domain in the placebo group.

Interpretation: Patients with relapsing polymyalgia rheumatica have impaired health-related quality of life. The use of sarilumab 200 mg once every 2 weeks with a 14-week glucocorticoid taper led to clinically important improvements in health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes versus placebo with a 52-week glucocorticoid taper. Improvements were highest in patients with most severe disease. These findings provide support for the use of sarilumab in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica whose disease activity and health-related quality of life is not adequately managed by glucocorticoid monotherapy according to treat-to-target principles.

Funding: Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(25)00041-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sarilumab group
24
polymyalgia rheumatica
20
glucocorticoid taper
20
patients
18
patient-reported outcomes
16
placebo group
16
patients sarilumab
16
sarilumab
14
group reported
12
health-related quality
12

Similar Publications

Interleukin (IL)-6 plays a central role in amplifying inflammation, and its inhibition is beneficial in managing immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). IL-6 signaling inhibition is associated with a slightly increased risk of infections in patients with RA, and older age has been identified as a risk factor for severe adverse events, including infections. Therefore, the combination of an aging population and the increasing use of IL-6R inhibitors in RA treatment highlights the importance of carefully evaluating the safety and effectiveness of these therapies in older patients with RA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Sarilumab is approved for adult patients with polymyalgia rheumatica who have had an inadequate response to corticosteroids or who cannot tolerate corticosteroid taper. We aimed to evaluate the effect of sarilumab on patient-reported outcomes.

Methods: This phase 3, double-blind, randomised controlled trial was done in 60 centres in 17 countries.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: While targeting the interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R) through the use of sarilumab (SAR) or tocilizumab (TCZ) has become a major therapeutic approach for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), direct comparisons between IL-6R inhibitors (IL-6Ris) for treating RA have not been conducted. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of subcutaneous sarilumab (SAR-SC), subcutaneous tocilizumab (TCZ-SC), and intravenous TCZ (TCZ-IV) against RA in a multicenter cohort study.

Methods: Within the target trial emulation framework, an incident new-user and active-comparator cohort design was used.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To evaluate the effects of baricitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, versus sarilumab, a human monoclonal antibody against the IL-6 receptor, on the disease activity of patients with RA.

Methods: At our hospital and cooperative facilities, we initiated treatment with baricitinib and sarilumab and observed patients with RA longitudinally for 52 weeks. Propensity score matching (age, sex, disease duration, MTX/glucocorticoid usage, RF/ACPA positivity and Disease Activity Score 28 with CRP level) was performed to address potential treatment selection bias, resulting in 46 patients in each group.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study explores factors influencing the start and stop of anti-IL-6 biologic DMARDs versus other bDMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis patients.
  • It analyzed data from a Welsh health database, focusing on treatment initiation and outcomes like infections and hospitalizations.
  • Findings show that anti-IL-6 bDMARDs were often chosen by patients with prior infections or kidney issues, and these patients had a lower treatment discontinuation rate compared to those on non-anti-IL-6 therapies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF